You said — “The Donofrio and Wrotnowski cases were not about a BC. They were about states vetting candidates. They were about stopping the EC from voting before using Constitutional remedies. The SCOTUS didn’t go for it. Did you read what Judge Alsup said?”
Yep, I read it — but what you’re ignoring is it’s about the *same issue* — which is that Obama is not qualified to serve as President of the United States. It’s just a different legal methodology for the *same purpose*... LOL...
Some people get too tangled up in the small details to recognize that it’s about Obama not being qualified to serve as President of the United States...
Nope. They didn't sue Obama. They sued their states Sec of State for not doing their job. Eligibility was a side issue. The cases were about candidates being vetted and whose job that is.
Some people get too tangled up in the small details to recognize that it’s about Obama not being qualified to serve as President of the United States...
Donofrio's case was about McCain and Calero also. His case was totally on state vetting process.
Obama isn't even the president elect yet which may hinder the SC since there are Constitutional remedies. Look, if you want to surrender before failure happens, go ahead.
FYI another Sec of State suit, in case you hadn’t seen it yet
Broe v. Reed
Washington State Supreme Court
Cause No. 8-2-473-8
Summary Of Arguments: http://decalogosintl.org/?p=65#more-65
date set for jan 8 2009: http://decalogosintl.org/?p=75