“No, Leo addresses what he claims were the original meaning of the words. His opinion is not supported by any law or any words in the Constitution itself, and is contradicted by Supreme Court decisions. So I’ll go with federal law and the Supreme Court over Leo’s opinion. “
So at least no you admit that he is making a claim. I thought before it was mere ‘blather’.
There are no supreme court decisions that contradict Leo’s way of defining the orginal definition of the term.
Go with whatever you want to but your still wrong. As I said before, in your description the words had no orginal definition at all.
There are decision which clearly state that there are two forms of citizenship - citizen at birth and naturalized. The court decisions define who is a citizen at birth.
Go with whatever you want to but your still wrong. As I said before, in your description the words had no orginal definition at all.
Like I said before, given a choice between accepting Donofrio's defintion and accepting the law and the opinions of the Supreme Court then Donofrio loses every time.