To: DJ MacWoW; Wallace T.
>>>>I’ll be interested in hearing the rest of the story.<<<<
See #9 above and click the link tot he Plain Dealer story.
I’m as concerned as anyone about the potential misuse of SWAT teams, but it appears not to have happened here.
They needed a license, they refused to get one. A search warrant was issued to inspect their facility and to obtain evidence of known and further wrongdoing.
End of story.
15 posted on
12/10/2008 7:15:13 AM PST by
angkor
(Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
To: angkor
Most localities do not use their SWAT teams to serve simple search warrants.
19 posted on
12/10/2008 7:17:27 AM PST by
WayneS
(Let's have More Andy Taylors & Fewer Barney Fifes in Law Enforcement!!!)
To: angkor
20 posted on
12/10/2008 7:20:07 AM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: angkor
I disagree, whether or not there was a SWAT team involved in the raid. First, the co-op sold legal products. Second, as a co-op, these legal products are to be sold to members only. The general public cannot buy from it unless they join the co-op. Therefore, the local government has no justification to interfere with the operation of this private business. This is the sort of nanny state attitude that has led to the disastrous problems that, on a larger scale, led to the subprime mortgage crisis and the decrepit state of the American automobile business. It has to stop.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson