Replies

>>>>>>Under investigation doesn’t mean “guilty”.<<<<<<<

FR is not a court of law, we are not judges or juries, and as participants in the FR debate and the civic debate you and I may draw whatever conclusions we wish, and state them here.

Yep, based on reading several news reports and the PDF of the court papers as well as the search warrant I believe they are guilty of selling food products to the public without a retail food license.

I believe they did this deliberately and in a manner designed to challenge the written statute and the local government, but without doing that with the aid of an attorney and going through the proper channels which we call “the rule of law”.

IMO they brought this all upon themselves - deliberately - and their charges of “SWAT team, intimidation” are all of the same cloth.

I disagree. The ODA has been trying to set them up. An ODA inspector tried buying into the co-op but was rebuffed. I also read the comments posted to the local article.

and their charges of “SWAT team, intimidation” are all of the same cloth.

I disagree with this too but that's not a surprise.

I am a conservative and I do not believe that government is the answer to all our problems.