I am however cautious when those who claim to be or have become conservative seem uninterested in a constructionist view of the U.S. Constitution. The brilliance of the document written over two hundred years ago, is timeless in that it foresaw this type of approach to shepard an effort to destroy what so many sacrificed to create. Those who oppose the fundamental beliefs that this country was founded upon will not and have not surrendered their attempts to destroy it.
I am concerned so many of the so called defender so this as an extremist approach to in some way replace the spilled milk into the bottle from the election. I believe those of us who are concerned for the strict application of the Constitution have seen many instances where unconstitutional application of laws have been enacted over our history.In retrospect, we recognize the intent may have been good but the application has been disastrous.
If such gross neglect as this were allowed to exist unchecked, what precedent is set that in the future would most likely result in disastrous results?
Are you saying the intent of the US Constitution may have been good but the application poor, or that passing laws or neglecting the USC may have been carried out with good intention but the application is wrong?
I've read several of DH’s books. I'd have to say that he comes across as fairly conservative. And the root of his conversion was his dealing with the Black Panthers and learning just what a group of Bolshevik-wannabbees they truly were/are. I don't think he'd be writing any glowing reviews accepting Obammie the Commie's election if it were unconstitutional given Obammie the Commie's penchant for using the same thug tactics as the Black Panthers.
One of those books of his that I've read is “The Art of Political Warfare.” Throwing the birth-certificate issue in the faces of Obammie’s Commies loud and and hard would be in accordance with the suggestions laid out in that book.
Of course, like always, I could be wrong about DH and his degree of conservatism. But there is another DH out there writing liberal crap. I wonder if the ripoff is using “David” instead of “Dave” deliberately to detract from the original.