1. Ad hominem attack is a sign of someone without an argument.
2. Thank you for your answer. I find most of the virulent Huckabee denigrators I've asked to be cigarette smokers.
3. Three of your four claims are false and due to your apparently malicious tone, they may be libelous.
Whether I “smoke cigarettes” or not has no bearing on his HUMANISTIC preaching or his track record of taxing people to death, seeking to give ILLEGALS merit scholarships or being against capital punishment. He is a friend to a Demoncrat with the exception of being against abortion. Frankly I can't stand his pious hypocrisy.
All you have proven is how idiotic you are.
Bringing up the issue of whether I smoke or not has NOTHING to do with the issue of Mike Huckabee being a hypocritical humanist. I partially supported WHY his is a hypocrite.
You:
1. Ad hominem attack is a sign of someone without an argument.
WRONG. Calling Mike Huckabee what he is, a pious, self serving hypocrite is not an ad hom. It is an accurate description of him. You provided nothing to the contrary and attempted to set me up for a straw argument through bait and switch - the two of you have much in common - take that as an “ad hominem” attack even though it is TRUE. Truth is your worst enemy.
You:
2. Thank you for your answer. I find most of the virulent Huckabee denigrators I've asked to be cigarette smokers.
Again, whether someone smokes or not is NOT the issue. Are you truly so silly as to believe that IF I did smoke, I couldn't see through Huckabee? LOL! It's more evidence of your holier than thou mentality and childishness.
3. Three of your four claims are false and due to your apparently malicious tone, they may be libelous.
ALL OF THEM ARE TRUE.
I certainly don't need “validation” from someone like you who resists truth and tries to label truth as ad hom attacks.
You, try to have a pleasant evening.