Posted on 12/06/2008 10:29:30 AM PST by Deepest End
Saturday, December 6, 2008
Supreme court of CA acted expediently and gave me an opportunity to file in the Supreme court of the US as early as Monday.
I wanted to thank the Justices of the Supreme Court of California and Chief Justice Ronald M. George for acting so expediently.Within two days the Justices have reviewed the case and entered their disposition on it today, on Friday night, at 9:53 PM. They have denied on my pleadings, which gives me an opportunity to file immediately in the Supreme Court of the United States.
Supreme Court Justice assigned to our ninth circuit (includes CA) is an Honorable Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy.
I have attached a wikipedia article about Honorable Judge Kennedy.
Thank you again for all your support. Orly
(Excerpt) Read more at drorly.blogspot.com ...
Excuse me, but NOT considering the issue will provoke a destabilization Constitutional crisis. Your prediction may be correct, but your characterization is ass backward.
I believe that is the correct path.
Think about it.
You just don't think the US Constitution matters anymore? That is sad.
There are many places one can go for correct information.
Wikipedia is not one of them. Anybody can put/add what they want whether is it right or wrong information.
Your next question to me (so I will save you some time) is going to be: How do you know it is wrong? My reply would be: How do I know it is right?
Wikipedia is for the person who is too lazy to do honest research.
College professors are having fits with their students using Wikipedia as reference material for their research papers.
“If I’ve said it once I’ve said it a hundred times: no matter how valid the complaint, the US Supreme Court is NOT going to provoke a destabilizing constitutional crisis over Obama’s citizenship status. They just aren’t. Face it.”
Propaganda if repeated enough is often believed as the truth.
Let us hope that our court has a greater sense of what they should do.
What you put forth is nothing more than mob rule and not the rule of law.
So just because YOU repeat something are the rest of us supposed to just stop? I think not.
Best thing you could do is be quite and klet we who are willing to do the work, work.
So, shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
You did not read my reply.
Unless you have at least a fundamental level of reading comprehension, please don't waste my time.
You did not read my reply.
I read your rude snotty, remark and answered it.
Unless you have at least a fundamental level of reading comprehension, please don’t waste my time.
It is you who is wasting my time. I didnt ask you to reply to my comment.
And dont defend widipedia to me. It is obvious you are not a research person and look for the easiest way.
It sounds like I hit a nerve.
"Not to worry," the Democrats told the SOS when she inquired, we'll send you a new list of electors by email (forget about pesky certs required by law). "Too late," said the SOS, "we'll have to go with the original (emailed) list -- dead or alive." (I'm paraphrasing here.)
Why talk about the repeal of the Electoral College, when it's obviously dead already?
That only works if it is proven that Obama is ineligible to be POTUS, and if that ever happens (beyond reasonable doubt) then he will be removed.
I am a skeptic when it comes to Obama being unqualified (I just don’t think there is any real evidence that he wasn’t born in the USA), but I’m also skeptical that there would be a major upheaval if he had to be removed. There would be a lot of confusion, no doubt, and I would expect the stock market to take a real hammering (traders hate confusion and uncertainty) but the nation would survive pretty much unscathed in the long run.
It sounds like I hit a nerve.
LMAO - I posted a blog entry by Dr. Orly Taitz describing the status of her case before the CA Supreme Court and you go off on some ludicrous attempt to question my research skills and some Wiki is Evil tantrum. I could care less about Wikipedia or anything it says or doesn't say!
Please explain how wikipedia has anything to do with California Supreme Court - LIGHTFOOT v. BOWEN, Case Number S168690, or show me any specific reference to this case, it's merits, lack thereof or anything even remotely involving this case in any wikipedia link.
Secondly, please copy or point to any post in which I have "defended wikipedia" as you state.
If possible, try and be specific and avoid ranting.
Your obsession with wiki is bizarre, completely irrelevant, yet oddly entertaining ... for now.
And yes, I am soliciting a response. We'll see how well you can muster up a coherent reply.
Do you if there has been any conclusive resolution on how they will deal with it?
Secondly, The Donofrio v. Wells case in effect concedes that he was born in Hawaii, but that given he was a subject to the laws governing Great Britain (by way of his purported father), that he cannot be a Natural Born Citizen.
The sad part is that BO could end this issue once and for all simply by instructing Hawaii to release his birth certificate (if there is one.) That he doesn’t do such a simple thing is the one thing that gives this matter some credibility.
How many of these cases are there, EV?
You said — “Wikipedia is not one of them. Anybody can put/add what they want whether is it right or wrong information.”
Wikipedia is very useful. I would say that it’s a very good starting point for anyone.
When you say anyone can put/add what they want, that’s true only for what they can document (i.e., reference) or link to. If someone put on there subjective information that is a poster’s opinion (like posters do here on Free Republic), that “opinion” would be erased, because it would not have any “reference” or legitimacy to it. On the other hand, there are articles that are there, which are “in the process” of being built up and there are “requests for documentation” posted right on the article, itself. And if none is forthcoming, then it’s something that can be requested to be removed because of that. Or..., you can change the content of that article that has no documentation by providing that very documentation that refutes what it says, and you can *erase* the erroneous information yourself, too. So, you *can correct* all the information you want on there, with whatever documentation that you have.
On the other hand, you can take books in the library and use them for reference material (for example) in a report in school. That would be fine — except for the fact that you might be getting liberal authors in those books. Just because you referenced all your material from liberal authors (and had a good selection of them), that doesn’t make your report any better than it might have been by getting some material from Wikipedia.
The nice thing about Wikipedia is that *you* — personally — can correct information that you may think is wrong, by posting it yourself and giving the documentation. If you have that documentation, it will stay in there as part of the information for that subject.
You’ll be challenged on your information if it can’t be documented, though, and it is merely subjective (i.e., you’re just “ranting” on Wikipedia... LOL.., like here on Free Republic).
A lot of the documentation that is given on Wikipedia is of the *exact same sort* of documentation that is given — right here — on Free Republic. We reference a link to an article or even a book (online) and it provides our documentation for what we are saying (even so, a lot of people on Free Republic give absolutely no documentation at all and merely state subjective feelings about some matter; I’d say over half of the comments).
At least Wikipedia doesn’t have that level of subjective statements on it, as is here on Free Republic...
Now..., I find Free Republic useful in various ways, too (even with it’s overwhelming “ranting” that goes on), just like I find Wikipedia useful, too.
I don’t know the exact number. It’s a moving target.
Lebanese files lawsuit alleging Obama is not American by birth
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.