There were no questions in their cases as to whether they were born in the U.S. or not. They clearly were and none hid their birth certificate.
What is there in the plain language of the Constitution that you’re missing?
It imposes a requirement before one is eligible to be president. Unlike any other candidate who has run for the office, statements exist that Obama was born elsewhere and his own behavior has raised a legitimate presumption that he is engaging in deception about his place of birth.
Where do you acknowledge this? We must have missed it.
And none had to show them either.
What is there in the plain language of the Constitution that you’re missing?
Not a thing. I'm just trying to figure out exactly what you're trying to insert into it.
It imposes a requirement before one is eligible to be president.
Yes it does, but no where in the Constitution or in federal law does it outline how the qualifications are verified and who does it. Obama doesn't have to show his birth certificate to anyone because nothing requires that he do so.
Unlike any other candidate who has run for the office, statements exist that Obama was born elsewhere and his own behavior has raised a legitimate presumption that he is engaging in deception about his place of birth.
Statements...but no real evidence, certainly nothing that would stand up in court. Nothing you can point to and say that it indicates he was born anywhere but Hawaii. Unless you can do that then you've got nothing but rumor and tall tales.
Where do you acknowledge this? We must have missed it.
Yes you have. On numerous occasions.