Posted on 12/02/2008 12:40:03 PM PST by wannabegeek
These threads have been attracting some very rude posters, recently, who just engage in name-calling without providing substantive answers.
Sorry, bucko. I don’t accept your premise or your attempt to equate Reagan with a buncha kook ideas.
Obama won the election. Get over it and get on with it. You’d be better off putting your energy into advancing the conservative agenda and working to get conservatives elected in 2010.
Three sixes..
Reagan Man’s entire posting history is a litany of substanceless flame baiting of conservative positions.
“The man without a past.”
He definitely has a past, but no one seems to bother what that past may be. How can this country vote for a POTUS who is a total enigma? This country is standing on the railroad tracks observing a train coming at full speed at it.
>What is going on???
Those that are in power are no-longer “of the peopple” and are willing to flaunt it.
>WHERE ARE THE GOOD PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY - ARE YOU OUT THERE???
I believe it was Heinlein, in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, who wrote: Government does not want a moral people, because a moral people are free; instead it wants laws that are so cumbersome and complex that you cannot help but break them, for that is how a government holds power over people. {Or something very similar.}
You’re the one promoting off the wall notions.
I’m just pointing out your lunacy.
Sitting in His Nowhere Land....
Making all His Nowhere Plans.....
For Nobody.....
Name one.
I stick to the facts, not dumbass conspiracy theories.
The only thing that I know for sure with regard to Barack Obama is that he was born of a jackal.
Whatever.
Those who voted for him, for the most part, were playing ‘affirmative action’ to promote a black guy to the presidency, reagrdless of eligibility or qualification. And the fifth column enemedia swept the little Chicago squirrel along to get their dream Marxist into office. Bastards
Exactly. Best advice I can give anyone now is prepare for survival.
“Sorry, bucko. I don’t accept your premise or your attempt to equate Reagan with a buncha kook ideas.
Obama won the election. Get over it and get on with it. You’d be better off putting your energy into advancing the conservative agenda and working to get conservatives elected in 2010.”
Why am I not surprised, ye who calls himself “Reagan Man” but is not fit to shine Reagan’s shoes.
This isn’t about Obama winning the election. For you to even make that statement shows that you aren’t well-informed on the issue of Obama’s birth certificate.
Now I realize some people can’t do more than one thing at the same time and perhaps you fall into that category. As for me, I am able to follow this issue and fight for the truth and still be able to work at advancing the conservative agenda and working towards 2010.
If we took your advice, we’d all be living in the future and not dealing with the important issues of today.
Man, what kind of Presidential library is this con artist going to have? Pictures of Michelle?
Not really. It just seems too crazy for logical thinkers to initially get their arms and mind around. The cases before the Supreme Court are real. Why is there a media blackout?
If you follow these threads, there are a lot who say, “At first, I didn’t think there was anything to this, but ...” or, “I thought it was some fringe conservative conspiracy..”
The evidence (or, lack of evidence) is overwhelming. He needs to show the damn Birth Certificate.
Manchurian Candidate.
Bush never tried to defend anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.