Posted on 12/01/2008 4:50:46 PM PST by Polarik
I’ve asked this many times before and never gotten an answer, so maybe you’ll humor me. How can someone claim a document is legitimate or false when they have not seen the document?
"How can someone claim a document is legitimate or false when the document doesn't exist?"
Second queston
Let’s say you read your birth certificate to me and you read you were born in general hospital. Let’s say there was no general hospital. I would conclude your document is false or wrong without reading it.
The claim is that the image of the document is a forgery not that the document itself is a forgery. No one has seen the actual document.
My second question would be the same as my first question, since you completely avoided it.
I don’t care where he was born, I care about his Immigration status.
Hi Polarik,
I’ve been busy so I haven’t kept up on all the technical aspects of your work so forgive me if you’ve addressed this already. I’m a little confused on the Factcheck photo part.
Could the Factcheck people or forger have printed a hard copy of their scanned forgery then taken photos of the forgery?
In other words, could I create a birth certificate for Mickey Mouse that I cobbled together using images of real birth certificates in my Photoshop program then print out a hard copy on my printer. Then use my digital camera to take photos of it and declare that my digital photos prove my Mickey Mouse Birth Certificate is real?
By the way, I absolutely agree the COLB is a terrible forgery.
Careful....Lamphere has turned on the previous BC guests.
I just looked at my Original 1959 Kansas Birth Certificate.
And it has the Dr’s signature, the name of the Hospital, and even my little foot prints.
I can prove I am Natural Born unlike Obama.
From your findings, it would suggest that the forgery started with a 2006 COLB.
Initially, it had no Seal or signature. After the Obama crime syndicate learned that the COLB was being questioned because of a missing Seal and signature, they had their Photoshop guy(s) add it in.
In a speedy effort to suppress claims to it’s authenticity, they did not look into whether Hawaii changed their Seals from year to year, and used the latest 2008 version thinking it would be suffice.
To me, it appears this was a sloppy job from the start. A mosaic of at least two or three images.
Obama isn’t very computer savvy (he thought the government invented computers, remember?), so he’d go by what his *experts* would tell him.
“How can someone claim a document is legitimate or false when they have not seen the document?”
Your question illustrates the strategy of a person trying to get away with the fact that he doesn’t have the proper documents.
Mystery solved!
Hawaii merely "modified its borders" in 1961 to include the nation of Kenya. That way, Obama could say he was born "in" Hawaii.
OBAMA’S ‘BORN’ CONSPIRACY - Important and corrections.
Ping, Ping.
Got it...
Appreciate the ping ...
Thanks, LucyT
Ping.
Bumping again.
FR’s Polarik, Dr. Ron Polarik, will be a guest on Lan Lamphere’s show tonight.
At 11PM EST; 10PM CST, Listen Here:
Lan sounds like an idiot on Patriot Brigade .. at least in your session. I’m a Computer Scientist and never heard of a Drum Scanner .. rediculous. Only a Moron would draw such lame analogies.
The Worldnetdaily article on this issue is up now:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=82503
That moron doesn’t even know the difference between shareware and freeware.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.