Posted on 12/01/2008 9:00:22 AM PST by Victory111
Why has every major news source in the United States almost totally blacked out all reference to the Hawaiian Obama birth certificate controversy?
In layman’s terms the mainstream media may be afraid of showing up with egg on its face. Yet, the question about the allegedly fraudulent COLB (certificate of live birth) doesn’t want to go away. It is more than simple curiosity that is driving the quest; it is a strong desire for the truth and the hope of avoiding a constitutional crisis that would be unparalleled in our entire history as a nation.
(Excerpt) Read more at crossactionnews.com ...
Your post is amazing. I didn’t read the original article you linked to yet, but the points are so OUTSTANDING that I wish it had been part of the Tribune letter today.
I fear no one with political or journalistic power will touch this. Yet we need a hero who will, because LAWS MEAN THINGS, and we need our legal system. All we need is a check to make sure he is eligible, for G-d’s sake. Let’s suck up some courage, make this happen, and all will be well. If he’s eligible, let’s see it and move on.
Yes, like the eminent domain law. They might do it again should Obama not be eligible. No courage to go against the voters, even though it would have been OBAMA duping the voters, not the SCOTUS, if he was ineligible. He cannot claim he did not know he wasn't eligible, because of his obfuscations to this day.
There is another lawsuit against Barack Obama. I am Susan of In Re Susan, cases 07-9804 & 08-6622 thus I am the only American ever to have three cases active simultaneously and the only American ever to be granted the standing of constitutional authority and original jurisdiction upon a pro se basis. When In Re Susan was first denied oral argument the Court violated Marbury thus it acted to overthrow the law. I turned around and sued the Chief Justice and the Solicitor General failed to respond within 30 days and failed after the Court acted to unviolate Marbury as they combined both suits into one case as if I was never, ever heard and denied justice once. To address the breach of contract, the Declaration and Constitution, I then filed an emergency application for a stay of enforcement of judgment, the 2008 Presidential election, appealing directly to Roberts. Roberts received it and immediately acted upon it by setting In Re Susan for conference on December 5th. If you look at the docket there is no response made by the Solicitor but conference is set.
I am the only person who can meet every single thing you must to then do what I am doing as I began standing down the Congress and the entire federal government last February, as I began with the military then moved into federal court and then to Congress itself. What all of you did constitutes treason and Barack Obama should go to jail as he knew long ago he did not qualify for this office and if challenged he had no defense as I told him repeatedly; if he is a law professor as he claims? He owns knowledge of the law so he knows thus it is deliberate or a crime. For him to say he respects the law is for him to lie. Apparently these guys think I’m nothing but a chick so they did not have to obey the law. Think again.
It is as I told Roberts it is: “This is a coup; it is men acting to overthrow our law absolutely and wholly by acting against women and so changing the term known as natural birth only to then trade this office upon the dollar and to preserve, protect and defend the invention of the institutions - the President and Chief Justice - as all male. They, along with the voters, have committed what is nothing other than treason as they all knew natural birth is a qualification, that no member of Congress can ever overcome the conflict of interest to then act as President or Commander and as ignorance is not an excuse. Neither is denial as that is a mental illness thus they are then unfit to serve if they are in denial. Legally and actually I can and may fire shots as I served you with notice and a petition and the only other case equivalent to mine is the Declaration of Independence which itself is an actual petition. I can and may shoot and you may not hold me or find me for it as self-defense and safety is my duty and my right. Call me the American Revolution known as Susan.”
I do not know if they will docket this petition as another separate case or merely attach it to In Re Susan 08-6622 as I volunteered to argue it cold based only upon the application for a stay of enforcement. A stay is sent to one Justice only; this went to Roberts and as I said he then acted. In case you do not understand: Marbury vested our vote with actual authority and power and made us equal to the President thus our one vote is also the power of Executive Order so any citizen can and may issue an Executive Order if the need arises. I did making me the acting, legal President as it was obeyed. If Marbury is violated at the time you then hold an election? The election is not legal, binding or valid and the results are invalidated. As the Supreme Court, by re-docketing my case, acted to then reinstate or unviolate Marbury but the solicitor general failed so the contracts known as the Declaration and Constitution were breached or overthrown it is the voters - the people - who are then guilty and liable for damages. I sued every single one of you except the clerks of the Supreme Court.
All three cases are not the same; it only appears as if they are. LOL! I did not name the second case In Re Susan; I named it something else – another name – and gave it a caption. It only appears as if they are the same as the court renamed it. The caption? This is becoming so tragic it is funny: “A Natural Born Citizen Denied Justice Absolutely As Discrimination Is Real Thus APPEARANCES ARE DECEIVING Which Is Why Acting Defines You And Life, Not Death, Is Proof”.
“Natural birth” is the case for women a la Brown as men will not and do not give birth to new, baby constitutions!!!
If you send your email to me at bdobry@bellsouth.net I will send you the file so you can read a copy of the petition if you are interested. The point of law you all missed?
Bush V Gore, as it is actually a tie only none of you knew it as Rhenquist faked you out and pulled a power play more clever than John Marshal’s. He deliberately left the door open for us to sue but only I realized it. The actual reasons making Bush V Gore unconstituional are several and not one other person understood it as the only number that ever counted is one, as in: one person, one vote and one nation, or, one absolute and one whole. It is about the power of one. So is the Obama issue. I proved: “I (my vote) am a power of one.” First I unseated Bush and then I kicked all off of the ballot thus proving the citizens had zero opportunity to act in self-defense as no choice for President was or is legal (this resolves how to invalidate it and not cause rioting) as not only do you have to prove material harm but you must prove that if you were on the ballot you would have won and then could have acted as you are able to Preside and Command. You do that by actually enforcing the law, suing to enforce it, and then commanding - you issue an Executive Order and sign it “The acting legal President and Commander”, get it? LOL! Obama publicly said he could not so would not make a decision alone re the military; he NEEDED others to make a decision for him. A decision re POLICY. You do not command by committee. Obama himself, with his own words, made my case for me, lol! I entered all of his words and then used them to argue my own case. Obama said: “I cannot so I will not” re applying the law to women but then said he could unify us. WHAT?! That is not humanly possible to do if you can’t apply the law equally to women and their children. Unity then is not possible. He admitted via words and actions: I am a liar, I am delusional and I possess zero ability to Preside or Command; I cannot preserve, protect and defend any constitution, not even my very own let alone Susan’s or We, the people’s and I’m not even a naturally born citizen to boot!
Recently a person told me that he traveled outside the US on an Indonesian passport a few years ago; if true? He then relinquished his US citizenship and he is not then even a citizen unless he reapplied for it. The US does not recognize dual citizenship so if you do this it constitutes giving up your US citizenship. I mentioned dual citizenship in an appendix; I may amend my petition and ask the court to compel him to produce any and all passports he ever held.
You know what else? As this is fundamentally a political question being addjudicated as an equal protection issue and the court has done this only once ever - Bush V Gore - and men have unclean hands as this nation came into being excluding women then it is only NOT political if a woman asks it! I began this suit in Febraury and April of 2007 in anticipation of this. I predicted this!
I now predict: My suit will win the day, lol. Call me crazy all you wish: There is indeed a covert government political conspiracy afoot; so many of you are participating in this conspiracy it is hidden within plain sight: It is the unethical versus the ethical. I,Susan, reasoned and decided to declare my independence from the unethical.
Susan. Again it is bdobry@bellsouth.net if you want a copy as it is way too long to post here. I’ll be checking my email and so sending it out later today. Thank God some of you are as pissed and concerned as I am! How eager can any person be to violate the law or to give away their rights?! This entire nation is out of its gourd; this nation is as Madison said: POSSESSED.
The reason illegals have anchor babies is because they believe (mistakenly) that they won't be deported. That's not really the case- what happens is that the parents are deported and that they have to choose to either take the kid with them or leave him behind. The kid, as an American citizen, can always come back down the road.
That being said, Obama's mom was indisputably an American citizen, so I'm not sure why the anchor baby idea is being discussed.
If you would care to explain your comment in simple layman’s language I for one would appreciate it. Doesn’t have to have every nuance. I do not understand legalese at all.
Didn’t Lan Lanphere set that up for Leo? He promised he would on one of this radio shows.
Then Lan started attacking Leo and Leo hung up on him on another show.
Maybe Lan just removed it or something.
Great, so the kids of illegal aliens can run for President then.
...I'm confused...those 'kids of illegals' wouldn't have a parent who is a U.S. citizen...
Ping to post #63
Thanks justice. Check out post #63.
You’re probably right, unfortunately. The Supreme Court is a bunch of wusses and they are not likely to stand up for the constitution even though that’s why we put them there.
I do think they’ll split the baby in some way. Yours is one way. Here’s another: They find that Obama’s status as naturalized/natural is undetermined and they instruct the Electoral College to consider that when they make their votes. It’s like the judge’s instructions to a jury before deliberation. The end result would be no effect, Obama retains the presidency, the constitution is not upheld, and they hang their hats on something superfluous. If it is not here or your position that they hang their hats, it will be some other similar wobbly spot.
.
Thanks potlatch -
I wrote you about this ping!
.
Eye kno!
ewe kno eye kno ewe kno!
.
Hooooo-Kaaaaaaa
Ka hooee to youee toee.
I know not what I just said!
.
Like “OK!”
OK?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.