This is censorship.
“She has google ads on her site.”
I just looked at these two pages and didn’t see and Google AdSense ads:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/11/sandboxed-black.html
I’m old, and my eyes aren’t what they used to be. Correct me if I’m wrong.
I also just did a Google search, using — “Atlas Shrugs” sandboxed — and received 4,100 Results, including Geller’s page charging sandboxing and censorship at #4.
I’m not saying Google is above censorship, but we need to be careful here. If Geller can prove censorship that would be the end of Google.
With a few exceptions (Sinclair), I have every unflattering and negative story ever written about Obama on my site, and have had no problems with Google, or any other web entity.
The Obama Campaign did attempt to intimidate me and a couple of others last June, using the Washington Post and an affirmative-action appointee to Princeton’s Advanced Studies Institute, but Google and the rest have left me alone.
Again, I’m not saying those two libs running Google aren’t capable of hanky-panky, just that we need to be careful throwing charges around until we know more. In the meantime, we’ll all just watch the web investigative process take its course.
Cheers . . .
This is censorship.
LOL............ Doesn’t private entities have that right within rules and regs?