— You came here only to attack Polarik. It is the reason you joined this forum. —
You’re damn right, I am. I made that clear from the start.
— Do you know Ron Polarik? Do you know he hasn’t earned a Ph. D.? —
He has been repeatedly asked — politely and impolitely — to provide credentials and documentation of where he earned his PhD. He is unable to do so. Now why do you think that is?
Because he is a liar, Parker. There is no way around it. Now add in the fact that he manufactures evidence, and impersonates a PhD., and what else can you call him?
This is who you - and a handful of freepers - put stock in. Shame on you all.
Come on now, when his credentials keep changing, how do you expect him to remember where he got them from?
For instance, last June, "Ron Polarik" described his credentials as thus:
I've been working with computers, printers, and typewriters for over 20 years, and given a set of printed letters, I can discern what kind of device made them.
In that whole initial report, no mention was made of any advanced degrees or credentials beyond the above. Not even an identification as "Dr." Some months later, those credentials became:
I'm Dr. Ron Polarik. I have a Ph.D. in Instructional Media. And my expertise is in computer graphics and the use of computer peripherals, such as printers and scanners, to input digital images into the computer. I've done a lot of work with reading web pages, where image size and image quality are very important. I'm fully qualified to spot inconsistencies and anomalies in images, especially digital images, given my expertise.
My personal favorite credential is "I've done a lot of work with reading web pages." So he reads a lot of web pages. Impressive.
At some point, "Polarik" also started (irregularly) claiming that he had a Masters Degree in Educational Research, Design, and Testing.
For what it's worth, "Polarik" once rebutted Neal Krawetz (whose credentials ARE published and verifiable), by stating that he got his Masters before Krawetz was born. As Krawetz is approximately 40, this would make "Polarik" approximately 65 or older, and would mean he got his 'doctorate' sometime in the late 1970s. Or closer to 30 years than his initially-claimed 20.
Fun fact: the JPEG was invented in 1991.
Polarik has no reason to respond to your rude and crude remarks.
I wouldn’t.
You’re not a nice person.
Because he is a liar. There is no way around it. Now add in the fact that he manufactures evidence, ..., and what else can you call him?
hmmmmm......by your own words, you are stating the 'birthers' case re Obama.