The article at hackerfactor link provided up thread does a much better job than I could and the author has a real PhD.
I read it, and was unimpressed.
Rather than attempt to find the truth he was more bent towards proving he should be the sole source of the conclusions.
And so what if he is a PHD, and that means is that he has spent a lot of time being told what to thinkl by liberal professors and judged on weather or not any of their thinking has taken hold in his thesis.
Logic tells us that we should attempt to prove how those anomalies were created in the first place. His point is that they don’t exist, or of no consequence. I say they do exist and I can show how they were created, and that they can be created with photoshop, which is very important, because it shows them to be a forgery.