Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sloth
Simply not true. British citizenship has no bearing on U.S. citizenship.

How so? It's my impression that the US did not recognize "dual citizenship" until just a few years ago. It certainly did not recognize such in 1961. If Obama was a British subject then he most assuredly was not a US "natural born citizen"!

Regards,
GtG

45 posted on 11/16/2008 4:38:48 PM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Gandalf_The_Gray
How so? It's my impression that the US did not recognize "dual citizenship" until just a few years ago. It certainly did not recognize such in 1961.

That's fine. It doesn't have to. The U.S. certainly DID recognize U.S. citizenship, which is all that matters.

If Obama was a British subject then he most assuredly was not a US "natural born citizen"!

Untrue. One has no effect on the other. There is no caveat in U.S. citizenship law that says, "Oh yeah, unless you're also British."

51 posted on 11/16/2008 5:42:21 PM PST by Sloth (What's the difference between taxation and armed robbery, aside from who's doing it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson