[San Jacinto]

Why did you add "Obama born in Hawaii" to the title?

The article makes no such claim. Instead, it attacks the lawsuit based on what the author calls Berg's clear lack of standing-- a procedural issue.

As to the actual merits of the claim that obama was NOT born in Hawaii, the author says this:

There are very legitimate questions about Obama's birth certificate and family history.

So why did you add the misleading statement?

[Frantzie]

FR appears to be filled with O-Bots or ostriches who want to read nice little posts about nothing.

A third case has been filed by a retired NJ attorney. It has been winding it’s way through NJ courts. The gentleman from NJ is not solicting money just needs help getting the word out.

http://www.democratic-disaster.com/index.php?topic=286.msg865#msg865

[Dajjal]

Why did you add "Obama born in Hawaii" to the title? The article makes no such claim. Instead, it attacks the lawsuit based on what the author calls Berg's clear lack of standing-- a procedural issue.

As to the actual merits of the claim that obama was NOT born in Hawaii, the author says this:

> There are very legitimate questions about Obama's birth certificate and family history.

So why did you add the misleading statement?

I do not know why AndrewWalden wrote what he wrote in the subject line, but it is true that Andy Martin believes that BHO was born in Hawaii.

The reason Martin questions "Obama's birth certificate and family history" is that he says BHO's father was not Barack Hussein Sr. but was Frank Marshall Davis.

See:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2112695/posts
Part Three: Barack Obama Is Not Barack Obama
Contrarian Commentary ^ | October 22, 2008 | Andy Martin

Berg's work is "competition" to Martin's pet theory.