SCOTUS SOUTER TELLS OBAMA TO PRODUCE BIRTH CERTIFICATE DECEMBER 1 (Unconfirmed, see thread research)

Atlas Shrugs ^

[penowa]

All I can tell you is go to Warroom.com and listen to Quinn and Rose, yesterday's show. Quinn got phone calls on Wed. morning after the election telling him that the XM Fox News report on the hour was playing the audio of Richardson. He secured the tape of the one that XM played on Channel 158 on their Fox News hourly news and also the older one of Richardson from sometime earlier this year when he addressed La Raza in Spanish with an interpreter. I don't have a copy, but I heard both of them played on his show yesterday morning.

Also, I didn't think to check...someone has been posting a "Quinn and Rose in the Morning" thread on FR, and it might have been discussed on there yesterday.

[Califreak]

Wylie Drake

http://gto7.wordpress.com/2008/11/07/vice-presidential-candidate-filing-lawsuit-against-obama/

[Domestic Church]

Curious Ping!

[Iowan]

Thanks for the Ping LucyT

WOW!!

[Tanniker Smith]

Doesn't one of the justices administer the oath of office?

No. But it's good for the show.

[savedbygrace]

OK nick, there’s more info here:

http://comments.obamacrimes.com/blog/_archives/2008/11/4/3962509.html

Apparently, Souter has not asked Obama to produce his vault BC, only to reply to the writ of certiorari by Dec 1 (though that order is not up on the USSC website at this time, so we don’t know for certain if that is for real) and maybe the Court will decide whether to hear the case or not, based on their reply and Berg’s reply to their reply.

So, at this point, it looks like whichever blogger originated this story got it wrong. We’re a long way from anything meaningful actually happening.

[skinkinthegrass]

here some more....
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/11/04/justice-souter-denies-injunction-philip-j-berg-request-stay-of-predidential-election-writ-of-certiorari-obama-dnc-must-respond-by-december-1-2008/

[mnehring]

bump 126- so Berg contradicts himself? Hmmm...

[Colonel_Flagg]

"Until that time," Surrick says, "voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring."

Hmm. As a voter and citizen, I'm the boss. Why on EARTH wouldn't the boss have standing?

I'm asking a rhetorical question. I already know the answer.

[Calpernia]

I don’t speak legal. I just provided what was on Berg’s website.

[gov_bean_ counter]

I'm not an attorney and don't play one on television, but I thought part of Berg's lack of standing had to do with injury. The court could not assume a victory and could not assume damages. Now that Obama has been elected there is potential damage. Just guessing.

[Fred Nerks]

thanks Lucy. Watching and waiting...

[calex59]

While you have some of this right I believe that the order wasn’t to show a BC by the 1st but that both Berg and Bozo have until Dec 1st to respond with arguments about whether the BC should be shown or not. I don’t think there should have to be arguments, either he is eligible or he isn’t. BTW, your post is typical of CS everywhere that are so afraid of violence you won’t uphold the constitution and force a cheat out of the WH before he can take over. Whether this is true or not, about Bozo being ineligible I mean, I don’t know but I think he should have to prove it, McCain had to and it is a constitutional requirement. Blood in the streets or not, he should have his tail kicked to the curb if he was born in Kenya or some other country.

[kenth]

If true, it’ll be a fake one, probably concocted at the highest levels of Hawaiian democrat offices.

[CaribouCrossing]

“Please... make it stop...................”

Now, now, you’ve only been here 7 days, so it’s far too early to be begging. ;)

However, there is a way for you to help “make it stop”. All you have to do is convince Obama that America has the right to see his original birth certificate. It’s really so simple. And speaking of being so simple, why do you think Obama refuses, after alllllllllll this time, to release it? I’ve asked others who hate this subject to please explain, and for some reason, not one of them...NOT ONE OF THEM....will answer my question.

[savedbygrace]

See #126.

[HighlyOpinionated]

“I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate,” says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. “They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power - even over presidents, even over presidents-elect.”

Also remember that on December 13, the Electoral College meets to casts its votes. If it has been determined that Mr. Obama is an illegal alien and therefore ineligible to become President of the United States, the Electors will be duty-bound to honor the Constitution.

I am flabbergasted and speechless and that's nearly impossible for a Highly Opinionated person.

[Dead Corpse]

No. If they de-certify the election because Obama isn’t eligible, we’d need a completely new election.

[Texas Songwriter]

Save

[Perdogg]

I heard that too.