Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/28/2008 10:16:13 AM PDT by Daniel T. Zanoza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Daniel T. Zanoza

No, it is codespeak for “From each according to his ability; to each according to his need.”


2 posted on 10/28/2008 10:19:17 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

//Obama: Is “Spread The Wealth Around” Code Speak For Reparations?//

Sure sounds like it could be


3 posted on 10/28/2008 10:19:39 AM PDT by valkyry1 (McCain/Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

It’s only code for socialism.

We’ve already paid a few trillion to “disadvantaged minorities” in reparations thanks to goverment programs like welfare, affirmative action, etc. etc.


4 posted on 10/28/2008 10:19:57 AM PDT by xcamel (Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

It’s simple Marxism.


5 posted on 10/28/2008 10:20:39 AM PDT by SumProVita ("Cogito ergo sum pro vita." .....updated Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

B-I-N-G-O !!!

That is EXACTLY what it is.


8 posted on 10/28/2008 10:22:10 AM PDT by Reagan69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

No doubt about it. Just google Linda Darling Hammond Education Debt and see how his likely Secretary of Education views this issue.


9 posted on 10/28/2008 10:22:39 AM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEYESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS


11 posted on 10/28/2008 10:32:02 AM PDT by Fred (The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nihilism and OBAMA IS A MARXIST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

In the 2001 WBEZ radio interview, Obama advocates “redistribution of wealth” as “economic justice” and as a “civil rights” issue. And a caller refers to Obama’s point as “reparative work economically” and “reparative economic work,” which Obama then calls “major redistributive change”:

OBAMA: But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. . . . One of the I think tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that. . . .

MODERATOR: Let’s talk with Karen. Good morning, Karen, you’re on Chicago Public Radio.

KAREN: Hi. The gentleman made the point that the Warren Court wasn’t terribly radical with economic changes. My question is, is it too late for that kind of reparative work economically and is that that the appropriate place for reparative economic work to take place – the court – or would it be legislation at this point?

OBAMA: Maybe I’m showing my bias here as a legislator as well as a law professor, but I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. . . .

- - - - -

Obamanomics: That’ll leave some Marx.


12 posted on 10/28/2008 1:04:14 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Obamanomics: That'll leave some Marx.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson