[Hang'emAll]

It is documented here

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/

[Azzurri]

It is documented here

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573

Which of the documents in there, specifically, mention the "serious embarrassment" wording? I'm not seeing it. Does that wording come from Berg or the Obama camp?

[El Gato]

Whoa! Did you see the last filing?

MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION.Memorandum

Athough, not knowing the lawyerees, I can't tell if they just wish have themselves dropped as a defendent. However it does allege that Berg has no standing to challenge the eligibility of a Canidate for President, and that they, the FEC, has no oversight of the Constiution's eligibility clause.

If that were true, the obvious questions are "Who would have such standing", and "what person or agency has the responsibility to see that the Constitution is obeyed, if not the FEC?"

In their request for dismall, Obama and the DNC assert that the Court has no jurisdiction over Art. II requirements. Again, then who does? (Of course they would feel differently about Amendment 15 requirements and Amendment 24 requirements. )

[El Gato]

Interestingly, Obama and the DNC assert that the FEC does have oversight in the matter(and that the court can't act until the FEC receives a complaint), while the FEC asserts that they don't.