Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lonesome in Massachussets; diefree

Yes I get it. And the reason for comparing 2008 with 2000 is because 2000 taxes were before the Bush tax cuts. If obama wins the Bush tax cuts will expire because congress did not make them permanent. That is why the site that diefree posted is not as accurate as the OP’s site.


35 posted on 10/20/2008 5:28:50 PM PDT by ResponseAbility (Government tends to never fix the problems it creates in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: ResponseAbility

Actually, I’m confused. If I go to http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411759 it is unclear what portions of Bush’s tax cuts stick around after either candidate.


36 posted on 10/20/2008 6:14:30 PM PDT by djl_sa (A happy republican now that Sarah is in the race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: ResponseAbility

From what I gather, the Obama link touts his tax cuts BEFORE the Bush tax cuts expire. I don’t know if the Obama site is truthful but I know that I make out better with McCain


37 posted on 10/20/2008 6:22:11 PM PDT by diefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson