Replies

I think it's fruitless to pursue the “was he/wasn't he” angle again. We don't have the time- and the public has heard it and tuned out to it.

What we need to push now is: “Did she call and intimidate?” - which also ties in with the spate of the campaigns other intimidation tactics of newspapers and media...shades of Marxism

Cover the story from that angle - it's breaking story - totally within her character and a golden opportunity to tie it in with these other two - Really bad stuff that the American people had better know about.

These three stories are linked - with the latest purported story of Michelle’s call making them ‘current’ - and let the media work out if or not the API story is true - the “story” being, right now, “Did she?” -

But a Golden EGg opportunity to bring the whole story of Obama’s ties with a murdering thug and campaigning for a politician in a foreign country etc.

The American public has a “Right to Know” -

Let’s email the 3 stories:

first:

the API story about ‘the call”

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78041

second:

the story that evidently riled her:

http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/oct/12/obamas-kenya-ghosts/

and then the story that belies Barry being loved by ALL Kenya - it’s tribal warfare -

“Obama’s Kenya ‘honeymoon’ ends abruptly after graft rebuke
Aug 29, 2006 “

http://www.mywire.com/a/AFP/Obamas-Kenya-honeymoon-ends-abruptly/1782891?extID=10051

Let's not get sidetracked. the media won't touch the story from ‘where was he born, did she admit” angle.

The US Media Outlets: Since the release of Mrs Obama story, many US media outlets have insisted that API should release the recordings made when Mrs Obama spoke with API. We understand the importance of the recordings in our possession and yet the first thing we are thinking of is not simply to make them public because groups are pressurising API to do so. The release of the information will be done, because we know we have Mrs Obama on tape, but API must do it in a way that does not put API in an embarrassing legal situation.

They are claiming there is a tape.

Assuming that this call actually took place and such a tape actually exists...

What we are hearing from AFI is that (1) they have a tape recording of Michelle's comments in this story, and (2) they would like to release the tape to the public but they are afraid of the legal ramifications in doing so because at the time of the call they failed to notify Michelle that they were taping the call.

The legal exposure for AFI exists with regard to the lack of notice of tapping which precludes them from releasing it to any other third party without her permission.

Okay, so here's an idea...

We need to persuade AFI to send an unedited “copy” of the full tape to....wait for it....Michelle Obama...and no one else.

Then, the media, the public, et. al., can start making demands on Michelle, directly (and the BO campaign indirectly) to release this “unedited” tape to clarify (1) the fact that this call did or did not take place (2) that the party in the call either was or was not Michelle and (3) that if the tape is in Michelle's voice, did she or did she not say what AFI is claiming that she said during the call.

Here's why this is an interesting play...

Transmitting/sending the tape directly to Michelle, who was a party to the conversation does not damage Michelle in any way, because she is the only one that is in receipt of the tape (2) once she is in possession of the tape she will be forced by public opinion to do something with it...either release it to the public to confirm that she wasn't involved as she and the BO campaign have explained, or refuse to release it because it is embarrassing.

This approach to getting to the bottom of this matter takes the onus away from AFI and puts in directly at the feet of Michelle and the BO campaign...

Now, if Michelle and the BO campaign release any portion of the tape, an edited version for example that takes out all of the really juicy stuff, then AFI is clear, without legal exposure to release the full and complete unedited version to clarify the full content of the call..

If Michelle and the BO campaign, who the public then knows has the tape, refuses to release it in it unedited form, then that will leave everyone, rightfully so, with the impression that the actually tape contains those statements that are so harmful to Michelle and the BO campaign.

Just one man's thinking...