Not what my congresscritter said, but then they all lie, right?
Heh. Well, I'd chalk that sort of error up to ignorance before calling it malice. And a few of them (maybe 20 out of 535) are consistently straight and honest with the public.
I don't think it makes any difference in the context of "is it constitutional or not," I just thought you might benefit from having more detail than is needed. The part that I think alters the sense of the argument "they added sweeteners so the Senate would pass it" is baloney. The Senate passed the pork, given the chance, 93-2. They did that on Sept 23, so it should have been fresh in their minds.