Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Legal Goon Squads
Capital Research Center ^ | September 27, 2008 | Matthew Vadum

Posted on 09/27/2008 2:56:39 PM PDT by vadum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 09/27/2008 2:56:39 PM PDT by vadum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vadum

Is this not an abuse of power? It would sure seem so to me. Where’s the National Buttwiper with all its outrage?


2 posted on 09/27/2008 2:59:07 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (November 5th, 2008. The "media" lied, America died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Isn’t it interesting that the self proclaimed “civil rights attorney” is working full time to take away the people’s civil rights.

This is Nazi Germany all over again in real time. When are people going to wake up? When they start loading the box cars?


3 posted on 09/27/2008 3:05:48 PM PDT by johnnycap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vadum

Where does anything say what the punishment is for denouncing Baraq Husayn ibn Mahomet, the One (piss be upon him)? Is it a misdemeanor, a felony, a fatwa?


4 posted on 09/27/2008 3:10:34 PM PDT by Old Sarge (Illic Haud Deus Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vadum

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbW64215HA8&feature=related

Perhaps a bit cheesy with the Star Wars theme, but a good watch...enjoy!

Arrest this, commie pigs!!


5 posted on 09/27/2008 3:24:45 PM PDT by phatus maximus (John 6:29...Learn it, love it, live it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vadum

this echoes of the tactics dems in the south used to intimidate black voters at the polls.


6 posted on 09/27/2008 3:25:04 PM PDT by machogirl (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Contact: Jessica Robinson, 573-751-0290


Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement

JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.

“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.

“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.

“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.

“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”


7 posted on 09/27/2008 3:25:12 PM PDT by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vadum

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BnLozS-TnM&feature=related

So, is Mr. Obama a liar that he now feels he has sufficient experience with the short time he actually did serve in Congress??

Can’t have it both ways, can you B.O.?


8 posted on 09/27/2008 3:28:34 PM PDT by phatus maximus (John 6:29...Learn it, love it, live it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vadum
Perfect example of life under OOOOBBBBAAAAMMMMAAAA the anointed. This crap head is a pure rotten piece of lying trash.
9 posted on 09/27/2008 3:45:46 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
Ha. And when I started referring to the 'Rats as 'The Sedition', some people thought I was full of shit.

Vindication is mine.


10 posted on 09/27/2008 3:48:41 PM PDT by Viking2002 (A man who never quits is never defeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer


Penetrating Insights into the Obvious
11 posted on 09/27/2008 3:50:42 PM PDT by MichaelAsher54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichaelAsher54

LOL! One of those community organizing nuts.


12 posted on 09/27/2008 3:52:03 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (November 5th, 2008. The "media" lied, America died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vadum
Whatever belief system Obama follows, with such contempt for freedom speech he is certainly alien to American tradition.
13 posted on 09/27/2008 4:01:47 PM PDT by magooey (stop the bs, fight the war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vadum

bookmark


14 posted on 09/27/2008 4:04:51 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
Is this not an abuse of power? It would sure seem so to me.

It is illegal and subject to private civil action and criminal penalties. These are the same Civil Rights sections used in the Duke lacross players against Nifong, Durham, Duke, etc. See:

USC 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights

USC 42§ 1985. Civil action for Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights

And criminal code:

USC 13 § 241. Conspiracy against rights

USC 13 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

15 posted on 09/27/2008 4:06:31 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
Is this not an abuse of power? It would sure seem so to me.

It is illegal and subject to private civil action and criminal penalties. These are the same Civil Rights sections used in the Duke lacross players against Nifong, Durham, Duke, etc. See:

USC 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights

USC 42§ 1985. Civil action for Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights

And criminal code:

USC 13 § 241. Conspiracy against rights

USC 13 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

16 posted on 09/27/2008 4:07:42 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

BTTT!


17 posted on 09/27/2008 4:28:08 PM PDT by STE=Q ("These are the times that try men's souls." -- Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: vadum

“Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign has signed up law enforcement officials to target anyone who lies or runs a misleading TV ad during the presidential campaign.”

This is VERY SERIOUS and needs to be nipped in the bud NOW by ANY and ALL LEGAL means at our disposal!

The nasty little fascist and his brawn shirts must be stopped!

Perhaps the United States Department of Justice can be encouraged to look into this.

U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division

OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT (18 U.S.C. § 241, 18 U.S.C. § 242)
http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/crim/overview.htm

STE=Q


19 posted on 09/27/2008 4:35:37 PM PDT by STE=Q ("These are the times that try men's souls." -- Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wequalswinner
"They will be reminding voters that Barack Obama is a Christian who wants to cut taxes for anyone making less than $250,000 a year."

Just imagine the outrage over a conservative let alone a Republican making this statement. Does being a Christian justify suspending the 1st Amendment? What's next, warning the press that unfavorable coverage or running opposition advertising will result in a suspension of your braodcast license...oops, they already said that.

20 posted on 09/27/2008 4:39:22 PM PDT by JrsyJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson