Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: politicket
I say all of this to draw your attention to an article that was published by Wharton in November, 2005.

One thing I was wondering about with all the insane loans out there: given that--unlike ordinary insurance--one is not limited to buying CDS "insurance" on assets one actually owns, and given that there's no clearinghouse of CDS bets, what would prevent someone from "insuring" a bad loan for many times its worth? That would seem to offer an effective way for a scam artist to make a lot of money, at least until all the phony bets kill off the CDS firms.

34 posted on 09/26/2008 10:09:32 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
what would prevent someone from "insuring" a bad loan for many times its worth?

That's effectively what a Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) does. It can be a tranche composed of bond insurance "bets").

That's why the "seller" of the insurance takes it in the shorts, and that seller has, for the most part, been investment banks and insurance companies.

Speaking of insurance companies, I don't expect AMBAC to last much longer.

37 posted on 09/26/2008 10:25:34 PM PDT by politicket (Palin-tology: (n) - The science of kicking Barack Obambi's butt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson