Posted on 09/24/2008 12:10:30 PM PDT by foutsc
Follow the Money: If you think Wall Street gives overwhelmingly to the GOP you're wrong. Democrats have been raking in investment banker money almost 2-1 compared to Republicans. Merrill Lynch was the only big firm whose employees gave more to Republicans than Democrats. Michael Franc provides an excellent summary over at National Review. Blame Liberalism: Democrats caused our current financial calamity. I know, the liberal press echoes the liberal politicians who bawl that it's the fault of those mean, deregulating Republicans. Noel Sheppard at Newsbusters gives us the real reason why: Jimmy Carter and a Democratic congress passed laws that forced lending institutions to loan money to people who couldn't pay it back. These stupid policies were egged on by the Clinton and current Bush Administrations. It's Not Bush's Fault. It's Barny Frank's Fault. In President Bush's defense, he tried to overhaul Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac back in 2003, but was rebuffed by Democrats (and some Republicans) in congress. Here's the money quote from Barney Frank:
These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis, said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.John McCain Saw This Coming And Tried To Stop It. He cosponsored legislation (blocked by Democrats) that would have reformed reformed Freddie and Fannie. Here's a McCain quote from 2005:
I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, ... If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.Capitalism didn't cause this crisis; government intervention in private markets did. Kevin Hassett at Bloomberg.com has written what I think is the best summary on why this is the Democrats' fault.
Bipartisan Sleaze. Wall Street became a giant hog wallow where Democrat and Republican, politician and banker, rooted cheek by jowl in piles of government and private sector money. Even President Bush's overhaul proposal wasn't to sell off Fannie and Freddie, but to create another bureaucracy to oversee the current bureaucracies.
Bipartisan Corruption. Liberals and conservatives must understand this. Our political system is corrupt. And it's a bipartisan corruption: Democrats ran Fannie and Freddie and Republicans lobbied for them while both parties lapped up bribes disguised as political contributions. The only way we can keep sleazy politicians from doing stupid things with our money is to take the money away. Government has no business in business, and business has no business in government. Take away the Federal safety nets for gamblers, and sanity will return to the markets.
We Must Stop Them Before They Breed Again! The regulatory firewall that is needed is between Wall Street and Washington, before their amorous cavortings spawn another monster.
Paulson: “We must encourage lenders to make mortgage loans.”
Gee, wasn’t that the idea that got us into this mess in the first place?!?
Regardless of partisanship, if people caught up in that no matter what party, are otherwise decent and honest to the best of their ability on-the-job, my heart goes out to them losing their jobs, as it does anyone who stands to lose. The CEO's, some people are saying some outlandish things that ought to be done to them. I don't feel that way even if they were guilty. I do believe they should pay a price, but we aren't living back in the times of public flogging, and I wouldn't want to go back there. But some people and more than a few are in a mood and saying some awful things on the comment board of one of the big news sites. Plus the blame should be apportioned across the board to government, Main Street, and we the people to some extent.
I'm seeing a lot of envy of the rich. I sometimes get angry about outrageous salaries, but I really don't envy them their lives or their money. A lot of it does get back into the economy one way or another, but I don't see "trickle down" works any more very well in the labor market. If the economy is healthy, "trickle down" does work in creating jobs, yes, if they pay a living wage.
I think a lot of them are Dems because of the influence their college educations (and the profs that inhabit institutions of higher learning). Also, the Democrats have been more likely to give them deductions while touting “tax fairness.” It semms that many on Wall Street like the idea of government bailout if risky decisions on their part turn south.
Today’s Wall Street types are a far cry from the “white shoe” crowd of the early Twentieth Century. A family friend in Connecticut worked for an investment bank in the Seventies. When he lost his job, he and his family had to adjust to a humbler lifestyle in Indiana for 10 years. Although he eventually climbed back up the corporate ladder before he retired, I don’t think a lot of the younger folks in finance have the discipline to give everything up to struggle back.
bookmark.
Finance execs lean Democratic; manufacturing execs lean Republican.
Both will back the horse who looks like the likely winner regardless of party affiliation in order to make sure their calls are returned.
Here endeth the lesson.
Finance execs lean Democratic; manufacturing execs lean Republican.
Both will back the horse who looks like the likely winner regardless of party affiliation in order to make sure their calls are returned.
Here endeth the lesson.
Finance execs lean Democratic; manufacturing execs lean Republican.
Both will back the horse who looks like the likely winner regardless of party affiliation in order to make sure their calls are returned.
Here endeth the lesson.
I like your success story where that guy managed to climb back up. Wasn't it Lincoln who failed many times until he finally succeeded albeit not in a business enterprise. Oops, he was a lawyer. Well lawyers were different then. Maybe some anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.