Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fraud in the U.S.A.: FactCheck swaps high-res photos with crappy low-res ones!
FactCheck ^ | 09/20/2008 | Polarik

Posted on 09/20/2008 9:19:30 AM PDT by Polarik

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-178 next last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator

To: Osage Orange

“Sure you do...........ROFLOL!!”

Would you like the same invitation I have given all others making claims about my life?


102 posted on 09/21/2008 11:00:51 AM PDT by TheNewPundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

I’m proving that factcheck is covering for him? Ok that make a great deal of sense.

No one else has access to the document because no one else has gone to Chicago to look at it.


103 posted on 09/21/2008 11:03:48 AM PDT by TheNewPundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

“I would love to hear exactly what your problem is without the lovely name calling tht has endeared you to many.”

How many times do I need to explain that the names calling started by being aimed towards me, not from me?

My problem has been explained. I want the election cycle to focus on the real issues, not the internet rumors.


104 posted on 09/21/2008 11:05:50 AM PDT by TheNewPundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPundit

What’s your true MO Marine?
You obfuscate and rant so much that I have yet to clearly understand your argument.
FactCheck is credible?
Obama isn’t a foreigner?


105 posted on 09/21/2008 11:07:14 AM PDT by JerseyDvl (What do Obama and Osama have in common?-They both have friends who bombed the Pentagon! - Bill Ayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

The only person in cyberspace to whom I replied, “a couple of days ago,” was the fraud, Koyaan

Incorrect, you posted the link to this thread and made certain to put my name in the “To:” tab so that I would see it when I logged in. One of your friends even reminded you of the link. Now you are accusing me of being someone else in hopes of my being banned.

More false accusations in an attempt to censor. How very liberal of you.


106 posted on 09/21/2008 11:08:19 AM PDT by TheNewPundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

“You obfuscate and rant so much that I have yet to clearly understand your argument.”

My argument has been made clear many times. I am so tired of typing my argument that I am going to just cut and paste something I put in this very thread just a short time ago. The first part is what someone sent to me, the second was my response.

“His supporters are blatant Marxists and terrorists. He’s funded by dirty dollars and willing socialists - soros, hayden - and self serving pawns - pelosi, reid, dean et al. His core beliefs are tainted - wright, alinsky, frank...He has been responsible for NO substantial legislation at either the state or federal level. His only defining votes are megapro abortion, ademantly anti-gun, and comprehensive socialist indoctrination via community organization, bribed youth corps, and unfunded universal health care.”

These are the very issues I believe we should be focusing on. They are the ones that are not based on internet rumors. They are the ones that we see every day. And if this isn’t enough to keep him out of office, then we have a very sad situation in this country.

Even if this fraud is real, which I doubt, this man is to the left of Hillary, and Hillary makes Bill look like a right wing nut. Obama is the left wing of the left wing and makes most other democrats look moderate. If he can get elected with a messages like his, this country needs a lot more help.


107 posted on 09/21/2008 11:11:29 AM PDT by TheNewPundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

Comment #108 Removed by Moderator

To: Polarik
Incorrect, you posted the link to this thread and made certain to put my name in the “To:”

That never happened. I only send things to people I trust and respect. Yet another lie sticks to the wall.

109 posted on 09/21/2008 11:23:43 AM PDT by Polarik ("The Greater Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

Was Steve’s last name Ragan??

You now have the same invitation, let me know when you will be in Fort Lauderdale Florida.

And my blog is not shut down. You can spend 10 seconds looking at my profile to follow the link. It’s called research, you should try it.

Are you planning on graceful or disgraceful?


110 posted on 09/21/2008 11:26:11 AM PDT by TheNewPundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

here ya go

http://thenewpundit.com/2008/09/21/apparently-my-name-is-steve/


111 posted on 09/21/2008 11:30:09 AM PDT by TheNewPundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

“That never happened. I only send things to people I trust and respect. Yet another lie sticks to the wall.”

Really? So this wasn’t you?

To: TheNewPundit
FYI:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2086586/posts
87 posted on Saturday, September 20, 2008 12:35:08 PM by Polarik (”The Greater Evil”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]


112 posted on 09/21/2008 12:14:07 PM PDT by TheNewPundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Poser
Two words: Band Width.

That's one word. Two words would be "Cover up."

I'll save everyone the trouble of coming up with creative, but still irrelevant, reasons as to why FactCheck changed their photos a month later, and immediately after, I posted my story.

Folks, listen up. FactCheck has been monitoring the blogsphere ever since the Kos image was posted. They specifically posted high quality photo files as a way to silence all of the critics, including myself, who felt that the scanned image was bogus. These photos, they surmised. would put the matter to rest. FactCheck felt perfectly safe as long as they had an alibi, and/or a plausible deniability strategy, to explain away any inconsistencies or incongruities that others might find, such as the wrong date s the photos were taken (as entered into the Exif data).

To imply that they replaced their pictures because of a needed to conserve bandwidth does not mesh with reality given that (a) these large file photos are not constantly displayed on FactCheck's web page. They can only be be accessed indirectly by clicking on text or image hyperlinks, and (b) by contrast, FactCheck could have securely stored them on a free Photobucket account.

If Photobucket can store over six billion images for nothing and next to nothing, how would it be that the deep-pocketed Annenberg foundation, who fund FactCheck, can't find the cash to keep less than 16 MB of file space open?

113 posted on 09/21/2008 12:16:24 PM PDT by Polarik ("The Greater Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
"That never happened. I only send things to people I trust and respect. Yet another lie sticks to the wall." Here's a picture for you that I am sure you will claim is a forgery. Photobucket
114 posted on 09/21/2008 12:17:59 PM PDT by TheNewPundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: All

BUMP!

the MSM will not report the coverup.


115 posted on 09/21/2008 12:29:11 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

Horse Crap.

Anybody who wanted to grab a copy of the high resolution images already did. The lo-res images are there to conserve bandwidth.


116 posted on 09/21/2008 12:57:49 PM PDT by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

Comment #117 Removed by Moderator

To: Polarik

“I sent you this FYI as a direct follow-up to my reply above. Not as an excuse for you to jump in and insult me.”

Your previous post claimed that you didn’t post to me at all. Now you are saying that you did so for a certain reason. Sounds like you are confused. Is researching something before you spout off above your pay grade?

So 19 days later you claim that your case is proven true because factcheck switched to lower resolution pictures on their site. How could you possibly send something like that to me and not expect me to make fun of you?

Your “evidence” against factcheck is laughable. Your accusing me of being Steve is hilarious. And the fact that you claimed that you didn’t post to me before you claimed that you did is very John Kerry like.


118 posted on 09/21/2008 1:39:35 PM PDT by TheNewPundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; All; Spunky; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; 1035rep; 1curiousmind; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

Bakken Formation Update

http://noiri.blogspot.com/2008/09/ever-heard-of-bakken-formation.html


119 posted on 09/21/2008 1:43:43 PM PDT by FARS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FARS

Interesting and game-changing.

It needs its own thread.


120 posted on 09/21/2008 1:55:37 PM PDT by null and void (I have proved Fermat's last theorem, but there's not enough room in the tagline to write the whole t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson