[3AngelaD]

So lucky you are. Here in DC we have the Washington Times, which used to be the conservative vote. But since they hired a mainstream media editor to run the place, they are bending over backward to be “fair,” that is, represent the liberal point of view along with the conservative. That is all very well and good, except that the Wash Post has made no such effort to be even-handed, or even fair, and continues to be a left-wing rag that sounds most of the time like it is written by 17-year-olds. So we have 1) newspaper with all-left, all the time content, and 2) one that is half and half, that is, our print media is now three-quarters left wing content and a measley one-quarter conservative content.

[Prov3456]

Until the Washington Times hired the new editor, we subscribed to the National Weekly Edition. We really liked it - but did not renew the subscription when it came due. We didn't care for the "new" direction the current editor is taking it.

In a way, not reading that (or any) paper doesn't matter anyway. For a long time I have gotten most of my news from the internet and especially Free Republic!