Obama covering up his sordid past? Impossible. /s
1 posted on
09/08/2008 6:41:50 PM PDT by
pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: pissant
Cant be true, after all he sat in a Christian church for over twenty years. ;-)
2 posted on
09/08/2008 6:45:32 PM PDT by
doc1019
(Palin '12)
To: pissant
This is trash. Sinclair is trash. There is more than enough already in the real world to defeat Obama, no need to wallow in this slop.
3 posted on
09/08/2008 6:46:23 PM PDT by
PGR88
To: pissant
I want you to listen to me. I did not have
"sexual relations" with that fellow (Larry Sinclair),
nor were we ever alone together.
Larry Sinclair on youtube claiming to have performed oral on Senator Obama:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY
4 posted on
09/08/2008 6:47:24 PM PDT by
ETL
(Smoking-gun evidence on all the ObamaRat-Commie connections at my FR Profile/Home page)
To: pissant
The more I hear Barry the more I think this just may be true (or at the very least I would not be surprised).
Why doesn't the fellow go to the National Enquirer they seem to be interested in adultery issues and candidates?
5 posted on
09/08/2008 6:47:42 PM PDT by
svcw
(http://baskettastic.com/)
To: pissant
I suspect the story is true, but given the poor credibility of the only witness, what value is it ever going to have?
8 posted on
09/08/2008 6:52:51 PM PDT by
bigbob
To: pissant
As far as I know only one set of allegations that have not gone away have been made, and those are the allegations of Larry Sinclair.
Actually I would think this is odd. If Obama was doing this kind of stuff, you would expect to find many more cases of this behaviour, unless you think he only engaged in this type of activity once.
9 posted on
09/08/2008 6:54:08 PM PDT by
microgood
To: pissant
Sinclair even received a tip a short time later that the polygraph examiner was paid off by someone in the Obama campaign to the tune of $750,000. From Axelrod?
To: pissant
Sinclair even received a tip a short time later that the polygraph examiner was paid off by someone in the Obama campaign to the tune of $750,000. From Axelrod?
To: pissant
Sinclair even received a tip a short time later that the polygraph examiner was paid off by someone in the Obama campaign to the tune of $750,000. From Axelrod?
To: pissant
Why doesn’t someone with the means to do so hire top-knotch investigators and get to the bottom of this?
15 posted on
09/08/2008 7:03:33 PM PDT by
no dems
("Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice...." Barry Goldwater)
To: pissant
While this story may be possible, even likely. This is not a hill worth dieing on. (placing tin foil hat on now) I think that the natural born angle, may be better to disqualify Obama.
Since the sodomites are a democRAT protected class, this angle won't get any traction in the sodomite controlled Drive-by media.
16 posted on
09/08/2008 7:05:23 PM PDT by
Ouderkirk
(I will not vote for Obama not because he is black, but because he is RED)
To: pissant
I bet there are not two molecules of that limo driver left to rub together.
22 posted on
09/08/2008 7:15:24 PM PDT by
gost2
To: pissant
This sounds like total bs to me. At any rate, if it were true, unless Sinclair still has the blue dress he was wearing at the time, it will never amount to more than a curiosity, and rightly so. Obama is a man with a family and children. The proof bar on something like this should be set very high.
To: pissant
The entire story is wobbly but plausible. One thing I don't understand is why Larry can't get his own phone records from the cellphone carrier - why wait on the Chicago PD unless the Obama campaign made Larry's records "go away".
The subsequent and seemingly indisputable facts run to the apparent false arrest in DC orchestrated by Biden's son, likelihood evidence tampering, apparent false imprisonment in Delaware, published threats toward an attorney who was to represent Larry in Delaware, and a well-documented and quick dismissal of all charges in Delaware soon after Joe Biden's selection as VP candidate.
If Larry is a "nothing", then why all the protectionist hoo-ha in Delaware?
29 posted on
09/08/2008 7:33:37 PM PDT by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
To: pissant
So, Young was murdered.
Sounds like Barry read the chapter from the Clinton handbook on how to “dispose of” people who could reveal damaging and embarrassing information.
30 posted on
09/08/2008 7:35:11 PM PDT by
waus
To: pissant
I’ll take Sinclair’s word over Obama’s any day. I already know that Obama is nothing more than a deceiving thug whereas I know very little about Sinclair so I figure I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.
To: pissant
Why would a guy as ambitious as Obama use his own name? Hardly believable. Also, if Sinclair is telling the truth, I would expect more incidental details. What was the weather like in Chicago that night, for example? Which room number of the hotel, or at least which floor? These are things that could be checked out.
To: potlatch; devolve; PhilDragoo
36 posted on
09/08/2008 8:04:09 PM PDT by
ntnychik
To: pissant
I think the Beau Biden connection is interesting. Not so sure it's a coincidence that Joe is VP on the ticket.
You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours.
Makes you wonder.
To: pissant
Why Larry Sinclair May be Telling the Truth
Because ordinary straight guys do not answer "arugula" when asked their favorite food. But seriously -- I agree with Pissant that Sinclair's story being so consistent on the one hand, and so "tame" on the other, lends him a lot of credence.
41 posted on
09/08/2008 8:16:40 PM PDT by
Dajjal
(Visit Ann Coulter's getdrunkandvote4mccain.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson