Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

I’m surprised someone hasn’t taken this all the way to the Supreme Court. They would definitely rule against it.


23 posted on 09/06/2008 5:24:28 AM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: chopperman
I’m surprised someone hasn’t taken this all the way to the Supreme Court. They would definitely rule against it.

Actually, I don't think they would. My interpretation is that states are allowed to choose their electors by whichever means they prefer. If a state chooses to stupidly throw their electors to a candidate they oppose, then that's their constitutional right.
26 posted on 09/06/2008 5:28:03 AM PDT by RetroSexual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman
This is a serious movement. They claim it is constitutional.
41 posted on 09/06/2008 6:06:12 AM PDT by kabar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson