Posted on 09/04/2008 8:02:58 AM PDT by Yanni.Znaio
Y'all don't forget to use your napkins, okay?
Awww....how sweet!
She had five bouncing little bundles of burdens!
Correction: According to Obama “She had five bouncing little bundles of punishment!”
I believe Pelosi raised her kids before she went into politics
better check out your facts before gloating
No wonder she is so bitter.
She was “PUNISHED with a bay’-buh”, not once but FIVE times...
There’s no WAY she could have responsibly juggled motherhood AND a seat in the House of Representatives, IS THERE???
It’s different.
Palin actually raises her children.
Pelosi hire people to do it for her.
Same with Ms. Obama -— she’s been a lawyer with her kids in day care all their lives. THAT IS OK. Raising kids yourself is BAD.
Keep it straight.
/sarcasm/
True but the alliteration value would have been diminished....:))
Pelosi has five (in the words of Obama) diseases - got it.
then Pelosi has been a very naught woman.
then Pelosi has been a very naught woman.
then Pelosi has been a very naughty woman.
then ms pelosi has been a very naughty woman. doesn’t she know what causes her go get these 5 burdens of punishment that she has been cursed with?
ping
Your comparison is not valid.
Where is 9% Nancy hiding these days. We haven’t heard a peep out of queen b.
Uh. . and now Pelosi has five great big old grownup FETUSES, I suppose one could say.
The Nance could afford a lot more help than the average person, and so can Sarah, who seems to have all the help she needs with the two little ones. Most of her BABIES look pretty much like they’re fairly near grown anyway.
Okay, let's dig deeper.
She's been in Congress since 1987. And that was when her youngest child graduated from high school, according to Wikipedia.
So we can assume a birth date of 1970 for this kid, unless he or she repeated a few grades (we won't, I'm just being facetious.)
However, that disingenuously implies that she was a stay-at-home mom up until that point.
But at usliberals.about.com, it indicates that
Several points about this.
First, you don't go from "stuffing envelopes" to the chair of the Northern California Democratic Party in one year.
There are way too many activist Democrats (read: competition for the job) for somebody to rise that quickly in the Party apparatus.
Second, if she's from a "family with deep political connections", well, chances are, if you come from one of those, you probably start getting involved in things political not too long after you learn to not wet yourself.
I suspect she started earlier than 1976. But let's let that pass and assume that the date is valid.
In 1976, her youngest kid would have been five or six years old. Small enough to fall into the "Palin brood" category.
With others ranging older, perhaps through high school.
Just like Palin's kids.
The underlying point remains, and I really just used Pelosi because the kid count is the same.
And the under-underlying point is that nobody asks a *man* this question.
Ever.
I was doing research while you posted this. I found it, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.