Posted on 08/24/2008 8:10:04 AM PDT by pissant
“Well, you are the only person on FR, so I guess that makes you the smartest, too.
Signed —
Your Alternate Personality Number 97”
Seriously, I was accused of being on dope, but you are the one to come up with that post?
Signed,
(sToNedD to the gIlLs) Your Alternate Personality Number 97
“Yes! We enjoy the dope, don’t we!”
I can see that you do. Anyways, Cowboys is on now. Maybe you could sober up before it is over.
Signed,
Your Alternate Personality 97
that’s the stupidist thing anyone ever said, smarty!
TNP is a rare treat.
Our youngest daughter was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on December 21, 1971 and her Certificate of Live Birth which was issued by the Research and Statistics Office of the Department of Health State of Hawaii and looks nothing like the one shown here in this thread for Barack Hussein Obama II. Our daughter’s certificate contains a File Number (151) and the certificate number (71 015396), my wife’s signature and residential address, the doctor’s signature, the hospital name (Kapiolani), the signature of the deputy Registrar, facsimile signatures of the Director of Health and the State Registrar as well as other information which is not shown on Obama’s certificate. Our copy was issued May 8, 1979 as a “true and correct copy of the original”.
But most importantly, the image of the perforation stamp on our daughter’s certificate is NOT the same as the one on Obama’s. It looks like his birth certificate is a fake!
104 posted on Saturday, September 06, 2008 10:47:54 AM by Stayfree
No they wouldn't. Lying about a certificate at least provides some sort of plausible deniability; they can claim that someone was "tired" and misread the records. Then they would apologize for their "misstatements".
Government employees actually forging government records is another thing altogether. Now they would be open to charges involving the manufacturing of (bogus) government documents.That means felonies and jail time. It would be stupid to take that kind of risk. It's just not worth it.
And FactCheck did not actually verify that the stamp and seal were in fact genuine, they just stated that a stamp and seal were visible.
And FactCheck has to provide some defense of Republicans. Otherwise they would have as much credibility as Daily Kos. And their defense of Cheney is totally separate issue. It serves no purpose to conflate that with Obama's CoLB.
And if FactCheck can obtain their own copy, why can't other media entities be allowed to do so as well...?
The second group "71" is the birth year. That's obvious.
The third group is "015396" which is the sequential serial number of the recording of the birth record in Hawaii in the year 1971. According to US Vital Stats 1971, page 259 (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/nat71_1.pdf) there were 15838 births in Hawaii in 1971. If births were perfectly even day-by-day births on 12/21/1971 (Tuesday), the serial number would be in the range 14918-14960. The difference of 436, is variance due to a recording that occurred some days later as well as reflects variance in the births per day.
Aye, that's the rub! Why the heck not!
Yeah, I think that the WSJ, Washington Times, and IBD should all press the Obama campaign on this.
You aren’t very good at this at all. Either Hawaii is in on your conspiracy, or they will charge him with fraud. And the original claim against the certificate was that there was no seal at all, not that there was a fake one. Factcheck verified the existence of the seal.
And factcheck provides defense of republicans the same way they provide defense of democrats. They do it when someone tells a lie.
You accuse Obama with no evidence, you accuse factcheck with no evidence, and you are accusing a state government with no evidence.
Pretty sad.
“thats the stupidist thing anyone ever said, smarty!”
Did you wright that one yourself?
I think, you have found the real reason for the black out, the date doesn’t match BO’s birthyear.
My apologies.
Check mailbox with regards to posts #335 & 336 (delete) . Thanks.
It took you about 100 posts to come up with that retort?
LOL!
Well that’s your mulligan for the day!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.