In case anyone is wondering about the specialties of these two academics:
No surprises there, and none of my kids are going to a school that considers their work to be a form of education.
These “academics” are obviously closet heterosexuals who probably wrote their paper one-handed while researching on Ann’s web site.
...political theory should be part of the process of identifying and encouraging all sorts of political and social experiments in living, taking part in a kind of high-energy democracy capable of sustaining ongoing transformative experimentalism in production, political organisation, learning and living.
A feller could starve trying to survive on the semantic content in that torrent of intellectual styrofoam. A textbook full of that stuff printed on the shiny paper will cost some poor undergrad's parents a hunnert buckadingdongs and end up on the floor holding up a wobbly table. That would be its finest moment.
A JHU, Whiting School of Engineering Alum
How come the description about these guys academic specialities has been edited in a misleading fashion. For instance, for the first one it has been posted here that
“Alans research interests encompass ... poststructuralist philosophy and radical politics ... Marxism, theories of class politics and multiculturalism ... Gender and Politics ... Marxist theories of aesthetics literature and culture...”
But when you look at the actual website to which it links, under the heading ‘Research’ it says ‘Alans research interests encompass political theory, media and British Politics as well as some aspects of the theory and method of political analysis’. It then lists his publications and concludes with ‘He is currently mostly concerned with theories of rhetoric and the ways in which they might be used to analyse political ideas and arguments in a world of electronic media’.
There is then an entirely separate section about things he teaches. This says that he ‘teaches about the politics of contemporary media (film, newspapers, television and internet)’ and that he ‘He also lectures on Marxism, theories of class politics and multiculturalism’.
None of this tell us what he actually advocates. And I can’t see what is necessarily wrong with students of politics going to lectures on these things as they have been very important parts of recent politics.