Yes, I'm pretty sure that that is the case. I've saved a lot of posts so it'll take me a little bit to get the proof. But I am a little confused because I thought that was what you were saying in your post. They did find some mass graves but they were old ones.
But then that is the whole point of a "preemptive" strike. A president is sending in troops to prevent a tragic event. If successful, there will never be proof that such an intervention was really necessary. The liberal/progressives have no problem with the concept as long as the president is a democrat but will try to undermine a republican president even at the cost of our troops lives. Republicans don't usually do that.
That's what I thought too and I believe that's right. But I thought you said something about this coming out in a trial?