[js1138]

But as you know, all classification systems have a dogmatic assumptions or theology of how things are to be classified in that system.

AI don't know any such thing. That is like saying the shape of the earth is based on dogmatic assumptions.

Now, please present a competing hypothesis that predicts where to look for things like Tiktaalik and why you should look in certain places and not others, or I will have to look elsewhere for a discussion. Not all "interpretations" are equivalent.

[mrjesse]

Said mrjesse: But as you know, all classification systems have a dogmatic assumptions or theology of how things are to be classified in that system.

AI don't know any such thing. That is like saying the shape of the earth is based on dogmatic assumptions.

All I'm saying is that an organizational system has a set of rules or statement which gives the system it's form. Whether one is organizing a bag of marbles by color, size, or roundness, each is a separate organizing method, or classification system. The ASBE (All Species By Evolution) classification system operates on the principle that ASBE is true. All classification systems have a set of rules or ideas or literally a philosophy which make them what they are. Otherwise, all classification systems would be the same!

Now, please present a competing hypothesis that predicts where to look for things like Tiktaalik and why you should look in certain places and not others, or I will have to look elsewhere for a discussion.

That's what I'm working on! Or more specifically, a competing classification system. In real science, the data is tested against multiple mathematical or philosophical calculations.

Not all "interpretations" are equivalent.

Absolutely correct! That's what I've been trying to say. I still think that with all the talk among creationists about distinct kinds I ought to try out a classification system that is oriented towards that and see just how well it works out, and see if it fits better with the missing links. It sure fits better with my own limited observations growing up on the farm. Maybe I'll learn that my classification does make sense - maybe I'll learn that it doesn't even work at all! That's what science is all about. Just because there is one idea doesn't mean that other's shouldn't be tried. The majority has been wrong before. I can't figure out why you're not happy that I'm trying to learn the truth, unless you're afraid of the truth.

-Jesse