Replies

You're just ticked off cause I'm loaded with facts and that I'm handily winning the debate against you and your fellow stormfront buddy named rightwinghour, who is an easy opponent in a debate. He's losing so badly he's given up against me. I argue with facts, logic and critical thinking skills while he is reduced to babbling over the technical difference between Congressional approval for use of force and approval for war. It's laughable. And he has another howler of a losing debate position when he is reduced to mumbling something about resistance movements under soverign governments versus occupational ones.

I did respond to your last post to me, but it was never posted. I got the "thank you for your contribution, it will be posted shortly" message. I also posted a reply to Ohelix that day and it never got posted either. I also sent you a private message telling you that your style of debate was terribly dishonest, and since I never heard back from you, I have to assume it wasn't sent either. If you'd like me to respond to your post again, I'll be glad to do so. I just hate for you to make a fool of yourself for thinking you won a debate.

I also sent you a private message telling you that your style of debate was terribly dishonest, and since I never heard back from you, I have to assume it wasn't sent either. If you'd like me to respond to your post again, I'll be glad to do so. I just hate for you to make a fool of yourself for thinking you won a debate.

What was dishonest about it? I successfully refuted every one of your points and made a great factual and logical case for invading Iraq. You can't argue with my facts, because, well, they are facts!

This was just another case of a total Paulite smackdown because you Paulites refuse to do any fact-finding and refuse to employ logical reasoning. I think it is just as easy to win a debate against you cower-and-hide pacifistic fools as it is debating the loony left liberals.