Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Outfoxes Congress Again
Lone Star Times ^

Posted on 07/16/2008 11:20:37 AM PDT by mnehring

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Moonman62

When gas is $1.50/gal there is no pressure to sign an EO, which is purely symbolic. At $5/gal it becomes significant and puts the Rats in a Trap. Still no reason for you to stop hating GW though. It gives your empty life meaning.

Pray for W and Our Troops


41 posted on 07/16/2008 3:28:20 PM PDT by bray (Drill Congress!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: bray

You’re right, it’s purely symbolic, but it is a bad EO and that was reason enough to whack it from the Federal Register back in 2001. I’ll pray for the troops, and I’ll pray that W retires early to Mexico and stops damaging our country and the GOP.


42 posted on 07/16/2008 3:36:14 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Hating President Bush on FR is so cutting edge. About as cutting edge as SoddomWood hating him and being against the war. What courage!

Pray for W and Our Troops


43 posted on 07/16/2008 3:46:08 PM PDT by bray (Drill Congress!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator
President Bush, the head of the Republican Party

Too bad, he's not head of the "conservative movement"

It was a very shrewd and calculated political move on the part of George Bush and he deserves the credit he is due.

Kudo's to Bush, it just makes me wonder why he passed up so many other political moves that would be just as powerful as this over the years?

44 posted on 07/16/2008 3:48:21 PM PDT by Popman (McCain as POTUS is odious, Obama as POTUS is unthinkable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mo

now that is a great idea with teleconferencing and online voting all of them could face the daily music of voters rather than the problem of figuring out which soirée to attend. Almost like really working for a living.


45 posted on 07/16/2008 3:53:46 PM PDT by scottteng (Proud parent of a Life scout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kalee; mnehrling

I did. I used spell checker on ‘precident’. It recommended up ‘president’. I was into another application, and didn’t give any attention to the inference. My bad.

These things can get ya sometimes.


46 posted on 07/16/2008 5:14:02 PM PDT by bcsco (To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Why didn't W lift the ban back in 2001, or any of the other stinky EO's on the books?

I don't know; do you?

Back in 2001 oil was a lot less than it was now. So were incomes, but oil was affordable. Today it's a different story. As for the other EO'S, again, ask him.

47 posted on 07/16/2008 5:17:28 PM PDT by bcsco (To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
It would take years for new supply to result, and Congress isn’t going to budge anyway. The price move was because of something else.

New supply, yes. But prices aren't dependent only on new supply. As for Congress, it'll do what is necessary to win elections. And if it believes the public wants change, it'll react. Perhaps not the way you want, but it'll react. As for the price move being something else; what are you referring to?

48 posted on 07/16/2008 5:20:52 PM PDT by bcsco (To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
I don't know; do you?

W's plan all along was to boost commodity prices, especially oil. At least that's what I got from his economic speeches, actions and inactions.

49 posted on 07/16/2008 5:25:43 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bray
Hating President Bush on FR is so cutting edge.

I've been on W's case since he started giving his horrible economic speeches in 2001. I guess I was ahead of the curve. I voted for him in 2000.

50 posted on 07/16/2008 5:27:28 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
W's plan all along was to boost commodity prices, especially oil. At least that's what I got from his economic speeches, actions and inactions.

What? You got from his speeches, actions and inactions that he wanted the price of crude to be around $4.13 (or thereabouts) currently? Do you really believe that?

51 posted on 07/16/2008 5:30:56 PM PDT by bcsco (To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Ah, double entendre. That's great. But if Obama gets in come November, Bush's ban will shortly be canceled. That's one thing I do know.

FRiendly ribbing aside, you are absolutely right about that. I don't particularly like John McCain, I wish our nominee was someone like Duncan Hunter, but when it comes down to a choice between an inexperienced Marxist twit, and a cranky ol' guy who sings 'Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran', I'm with the cranky ol' guy every time.
52 posted on 07/16/2008 5:32:42 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke; bcsco
I believe the word he intended was “precedent”.
But, your response was cutesy!


Oh I know what our FRiend meant, I just couldn't pass up the opportunity to be a wise guy. ;)
53 posted on 07/16/2008 5:34:55 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
the deadline to annually renew their own ban expires exactly 36 days before the election.

Due to McCain's campaign finance reform bill, Republicans will not be allowed to air any ads informing the ignorant masses about this fact and how congress reacts.

Therefore the DNC propaganda machine is once again controlled by the MSM.........

54 posted on 07/16/2008 5:39:53 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; Redleg Duke

I got hung up on the spell check. I typed Precident and spell check gave me “president”. “Precedent” wasn’t an option. “President” didn’t look right but I was involved elsewhere so I OK’d it. Sheesh!

McCain isn’t my choice. I’ll be frank (no, not Frank...Do be do be doo). But Obamanation isn’t a choice at all. This guy scares me to death. I’m still not voting for McCain come November, but depending on the situation, I just might hold my nose and vote out of fear. But don’t count on it... :)


55 posted on 07/16/2008 5:44:34 PM PDT by bcsco (To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Popman
Too bad, he's not head of the "conservative movement"

Concur!

As much as I admire G. W. Bush, history will probably record that his administration fumbled the last chance America had to remain "The Land of the Free".

56 posted on 07/16/2008 5:51:00 PM PDT by DakotaGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
I got hung up on the spell check. I typed Precident and spell check gave me “president”. “Precedent” wasn’t an option. “President” didn’t look right but I was involved elsewhere so I OK’d it. Sheesh!

Been there done that, you're not alone ;)

McCain isn’t my choice. I’ll be frank (no, not Frank...Do be do be doo).


LOL

But Obamanation isn’t a choice at all. This guy scares me to death. I’m still not voting for McCain come November, but depending on the situation, I just might hold my nose and vote out of fear. But don’t count on it... :)


I know exactly how you feel. Unfortunately we're in the position where the only candidate with a realistic shot at defeating Obama in the general is McCain. Like most Americans, I wish I could vote FOR somebody instead of AGAINST somebody but as my Grandmother used to say, "if wishes were horses, beggars would ride", and I guess that applies to us today.

I don't like it, but I don't like the prospect of an Obama presidency even more.
57 posted on 07/16/2008 6:00:53 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
McCain isn’t my choice. I’ll be frank (no, not Frank...Do be do be doo).

>LOL

Well, I just finished listening to Frank on my Sansa. I had to throw that in... :)

I don't like it, but I don't like the prospect of an Obama presidency even more.

I hear ya. I'm keeping my options open. I'm beginning to suspect the bloom is off the rose regarding Obama, but we'll see. If that's true, my Illinois vote won't mean too much.

58 posted on 07/16/2008 6:07:04 PM PDT by bcsco (To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Well, I just finished listening to Frank on my Sansa. I had to throw that in... :)

If you're a Sinatra fan, look up Robbie William's cover of "One for my Baby, and one for the Road", it is really excellent (IMHO), if you can't find it and want a copy, freepmail me and tell me where to send it. ;)
59 posted on 07/16/2008 6:16:21 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
If you're a Sinatra fan, look up Robbie William's cover of "One for my Baby, and one for the Road", it is really excellent (IMHO)...

I'll definitely check that out. Thanks!!

Sinatra, Fitzgerald, Basie, Armstrong... That's my music. Oh, man, I'm aging myself... :O

60 posted on 07/16/2008 6:23:00 PM PDT by bcsco (To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson