Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Enough Already -- the US Needs to Drill Offshore
http://www.janereinheimer.com ^ | July 16, 2008 | Jane Reinheimer

Posted on 07/16/2008 8:37:19 AM PDT by janereinheimer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 07/16/2008 8:37:20 AM PDT by janereinheimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: janereinheimer
The Marxist Dimocrats said no drilling, let them pay $6.00 per gallon. So, no drilling. Countess Proveskiovich has spoken.
2 posted on 07/16/2008 8:39:10 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (Congress in session, the White House occupied - Your freedom, liberty and rights are in jeopardy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janereinheimer
Just FYI...

Congressional Off-Shore Drilling Ban Expires Sept. 30, 2008 -- Unless Congress Renews

The question now is whether or not the Rats have the horsepower to renew the ban for Fiscal Year 2009 over a Bush veto. My guess is no.

3 posted on 07/16/2008 8:44:21 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

And King Harry of Las Vegas said we can’t drill our way out of this. But Why not TRY, King Harry!!!


4 posted on 07/16/2008 8:53:13 AM PDT by MaineConservative (Charlie Summers -- an Iraqi Vet and businessman for Maine's CD-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: janereinheimer
It's less than 100 miles from the prospective ANWR drill site to Prudhoe Bay and the Alaska Pipeline. That's the amount of new pipeline that would need to be built.

The Aleyska Pipeline took 3 years for 700 miles (including across the Brooks Range, the Alaska Range, the Chugach, and hundreds of lakes, rivers and deep tundra). An ANWR "connector" to Prudhoe Bay is more or less a straight shot across open tundra with none of the complexities of Aleyska. It could probably be built in less than one year, thus providing almost instant access to ANWR output via the Valdez oil terminal.

The AK Pipeline is currently running at about 1/2 capacity, and figures I've seen indicate it can easily move another 500K barrels per day (some say more than that).


5 posted on 07/16/2008 8:55:27 AM PDT by angkor (Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

>>>>>renew the ban for Fiscal Year 2009 over a Bush veto. My guess is no.<<<<<

I agree. They don’t have it.


6 posted on 07/16/2008 8:56:50 AM PDT by angkor (Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Thank you for the map. It gets a little tiresome to listen to the politicians make the claim that it would take too long to get the oil from Alaska transport.

What are they thinking? Building another pipeline? Don’t they realize that, as you point out, there’s one already there and running at only half capacity.


7 posted on 07/16/2008 8:58:13 AM PDT by janereinheimer ((I can do all things through Him who strengthens me.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: angkor

All the more reason to make sure we overturn the majority in the House — that way we get two for the price of one:

1) Nancy has to go back to her regular hiding place desk and doesn’t get to sit up there on her “throne”, and

2) We would hopefully get some reasonableness as far offshore drilling goes. I mean, these nitwits in congress may think they’re prohibiting offshore drilling but they are not.

They are merely prohibiting US companies from drilling. When a whole bunch of rigs spring up off the coast of Santa Barbara, I’ll just bet the folks out there will be wishing they had allowed some US friendly folks drill.


8 posted on 07/16/2008 9:02:44 AM PDT by janereinheimer ((I can do all things through Him who strengthens me.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: janereinheimer

>>>Don’t they realize that, as you point out, there’s one already there and running at only half capacity.<<<<<

When you discuss this with your ignorant and low-IQ Democrat friends, be sure to remind them that it’s ***LESS THAN 100 MILES**** from ANWR to the Pipeline, straight across a frozen, desolate, and featureless tundra with NOTHING living on it (except mosquitos in the summer). In the winter it’s a frozen wasteland incapable of supporting life.


9 posted on 07/16/2008 9:07:10 AM PDT by angkor (Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: janereinheimer
"China is going to be drilling about 36 miles off the coast of the Florida Keys."

Bush should extend out sovereignty out to 300 miles.

10 posted on 07/16/2008 9:09:02 AM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janereinheimer

A colleague today told me that the US exports roughly the equivalent of what is taken from Prudhoe Bay. Does anyone know if this is true, or where I could find the data on US oil exports?


11 posted on 07/16/2008 9:12:25 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janereinheimer
Lots of good basic information here:

http://tapseis.anl.gov/guide/what.cfm

The pipeline transports crude oil produced in several oil fields on Alaska's North Slope. The largest of these is Prudhoe Bay; other fields include Kuparuk, Endicott, Milne Point, Pt. McIntyre, and most recently, Alpine. The pipeline system was built in 1974 - 1977 and has moved over 13 billion barrels of crude oil. The peak daily throughput of 2.03 million barrels per day was reached in 1988. The current rate is approximately 1 million barrels per day (2001).

12 posted on 07/16/2008 9:13:16 AM PDT by angkor (Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: angkor; backhoe

Bookmarking. Thanks for posting this info!


13 posted on 07/16/2008 9:14:54 AM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
"China is going to be drilling about 36 miles off the coast of the Florida Keys."

It is in CUBAN waters, thou.

Bush should extend out sovereignty out to 300 miles.

Cuban terrority, we don't have a say.

14 posted on 07/16/2008 9:14:54 AM PDT by MaineConservative (Charlie Summers -- an Iraqi Vet and businessman for Maine's CD-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MaineConservative

Correct. With a lot of things in life, you NEVER KNOW TILL YOU FREAKING TRY!!!! So, by golly, TRY!!!! Who died and left King Harry as sole word of what is and is not possible?


15 posted on 07/16/2008 9:15:14 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (Congress in session, the White House occupied - Your freedom, liberty and rights are in jeopardy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MaineConservative

I know. I’d extend it anyhow just to piss off Raul Castro or whoever the new guy is down there.


16 posted on 07/16/2008 9:18:24 AM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: janereinheimer

Can’t you see the libs in California watching oil rigs out in the ocean. Calling the coast guard “Hey, I thought they weren’t supposed to drill in the ocean, it’s going to damage our beaches and scenery” Then the look on their face when they are told “Only American companies can’t drill. That’s Russia out there and we can’t stop them”. So they get to have the potential “damage” and oil rigs messing up scenery, but still pay $6 a gallon. Too bad you nitwit libs.


17 posted on 07/16/2008 9:27:50 AM PDT by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

We need to get some photoshop pics out with a crowned King Harry and Queen Nancy telling us to “let them pay $10 for gas, I rule this nation!” Dang, I wish I had taken that computer graphics class.


18 posted on 07/16/2008 9:30:10 AM PDT by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

Me too. My computer skills are that I can type. Thank God for those two years of typing in high school, which the football coach made us take. He said it was one class even the dummies could pass! :-)


19 posted on 07/16/2008 9:32:10 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (Congress in session, the White House occupied - Your freedom, liberty and rights are in jeopardy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

why haven’t the oil companies drilled on 70% of the land that they pay big bucks for that they know have oil? If it was a problem of the government not letting they drill, why haven’t they had a pr campaign with some of their billions to have us contact congress? The oil companies benefit big time by these high prices in profits. Just look at their profit grows over the last five years. Take a look at an informantive site about the reality...
www.thetruthbehindhighfuelprices.com


20 posted on 07/16/2008 9:32:48 AM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson