Posted on 07/16/2008 8:37:19 AM PDT by janereinheimer
Congressional Off-Shore Drilling Ban Expires Sept. 30, 2008 -- Unless Congress Renews
The question now is whether or not the Rats have the horsepower to renew the ban for Fiscal Year 2009 over a Bush veto. My guess is no.
And King Harry of Las Vegas said we can’t drill our way out of this. But Why not TRY, King Harry!!!
The Aleyska Pipeline took 3 years for 700 miles (including across the Brooks Range, the Alaska Range, the Chugach, and hundreds of lakes, rivers and deep tundra). An ANWR "connector" to Prudhoe Bay is more or less a straight shot across open tundra with none of the complexities of Aleyska. It could probably be built in less than one year, thus providing almost instant access to ANWR output via the Valdez oil terminal.
The AK Pipeline is currently running at about 1/2 capacity, and figures I've seen indicate it can easily move another 500K barrels per day (some say more than that).
>>>>>renew the ban for Fiscal Year 2009 over a Bush veto. My guess is no.<<<<<
I agree. They don’t have it.
Thank you for the map. It gets a little tiresome to listen to the politicians make the claim that it would take too long to get the oil from Alaska transport.
What are they thinking? Building another pipeline? Don’t they realize that, as you point out, there’s one already there and running at only half capacity.
All the more reason to make sure we overturn the majority in the House — that way we get two for the price of one:
1) Nancy has to go back to her regular hiding place desk and doesn’t get to sit up there on her “throne”, and
2) We would hopefully get some reasonableness as far offshore drilling goes. I mean, these nitwits in congress may think they’re prohibiting offshore drilling but they are not.
They are merely prohibiting US companies from drilling. When a whole bunch of rigs spring up off the coast of Santa Barbara, I’ll just bet the folks out there will be wishing they had allowed some US friendly folks drill.
>>>Dont they realize that, as you point out, theres one already there and running at only half capacity.<<<<<
When you discuss this with your ignorant and low-IQ Democrat friends, be sure to remind them that it’s ***LESS THAN 100 MILES**** from ANWR to the Pipeline, straight across a frozen, desolate, and featureless tundra with NOTHING living on it (except mosquitos in the summer). In the winter it’s a frozen wasteland incapable of supporting life.
Bush should extend out sovereignty out to 300 miles.
A colleague today told me that the US exports roughly the equivalent of what is taken from Prudhoe Bay. Does anyone know if this is true, or where I could find the data on US oil exports?
http://tapseis.anl.gov/guide/what.cfm
The pipeline transports crude oil produced in several oil fields on Alaska's North Slope. The largest of these is Prudhoe Bay; other fields include Kuparuk, Endicott, Milne Point, Pt. McIntyre, and most recently, Alpine. The pipeline system was built in 1974 - 1977 and has moved over 13 billion barrels of crude oil. The peak daily throughput of 2.03 million barrels per day was reached in 1988. The current rate is approximately 1 million barrels per day (2001).
Bookmarking. Thanks for posting this info!
It is in CUBAN waters, thou.
Bush should extend out sovereignty out to 300 miles.
Cuban terrority, we don't have a say.
Correct. With a lot of things in life, you NEVER KNOW TILL YOU FREAKING TRY!!!! So, by golly, TRY!!!! Who died and left King Harry as sole word of what is and is not possible?
I know. I’d extend it anyhow just to piss off Raul Castro or whoever the new guy is down there.
Can’t you see the libs in California watching oil rigs out in the ocean. Calling the coast guard “Hey, I thought they weren’t supposed to drill in the ocean, it’s going to damage our beaches and scenery” Then the look on their face when they are told “Only American companies can’t drill. That’s Russia out there and we can’t stop them”. So they get to have the potential “damage” and oil rigs messing up scenery, but still pay $6 a gallon. Too bad you nitwit libs.
We need to get some photoshop pics out with a crowned King Harry and Queen Nancy telling us to “let them pay $10 for gas, I rule this nation!” Dang, I wish I had taken that computer graphics class.
Me too. My computer skills are that I can type. Thank God for those two years of typing in high school, which the football coach made us take. He said it was one class even the dummies could pass! :-)
why haven’t the oil companies drilled on 70% of the land that they pay big bucks for that they know have oil? If it was a problem of the government not letting they drill, why haven’t they had a pr campaign with some of their billions to have us contact congress? The oil companies benefit big time by these high prices in profits. Just look at their profit grows over the last five years. Take a look at an informantive site about the reality...
www.thetruthbehindhighfuelprices.com
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.