Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: GilesB
The Constitution is ABSOLUTELY silent on the definition of Natural Born.

It doesn't tell us what the meaning of "is" is either because it's not a dictionary. Of course, the intent of the definition is what it was in 1776 and where the founding fathers became familiar with the term - Vattel, Blackstone, etc.

9,363 posted on 07/20/2011 12:12:35 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9351 | View Replies ]


To: bgill

“It doesn’t tell us what the meaning of “is” is either because it’s not a dictionary. Of course, the intent of the definition is what it was in 1776 and where the founding fathers became familiar with the term - Vattel, Blackstone, etc.”

Exactly my argument - I further made the case that since the founders cited Blackstone more frequently than Vattel, that any differences in their respective definitions of the term must resolve in favor of Blackstone’s; his writings being more frequently cited and presumably more widely (commonly) familiar to all signers.


9,371 posted on 07/20/2011 3:45:41 PM PDT by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9363 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson