Update ~~ colmado_naranja’s eBay auction .. still up .. at $2,850.
Go to the questions and answers at the end.
Monday, July 6, 2009
Plaintiffs Obtain Extension of Time to Answer Obama/Congress Motion to Dismiss
Defendants, Obama, USA, Congress, Senate, House, Cheney, and Pelosi have filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint/petition. Their main argument is that the plaintiffs do not have standing and that all the defendants have immunity from all of plaintiffs’ constitutional claims.
The current defense motion to dismiss the complaint/petition was returnable Friday, July 20, 2009. Plaintiffs’ opposition was due by Monday, July 6, 2009.
The defendants took over 4 months to file their motion. I was only given 2 weeks to respond. Given the critical importance of this case, the complexity and novelty of the constitutional issues, and the need to do a thorough job, I sought fit to request a 2-week extension of time to answer the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
I realize that by the extension we are losing two weeks, but winning the motion is more important than not losing the two weeks.
The new motion day is Monday, August 3, 2009. I will file our opposition papers at least 14 days prior to the new motion day, and the defendants shall file their reply papers, if any, at least seven calendar days prior to August 3, 2009.
I know that many of you have been posting on this blog your thoughts and analysis on how we can defeat the defendants’ motion. Your input is highly appreciated. I am asking that you continue to give me your ideas in this public blog.
I encourage the open exchange of ideas so that we may all arrive at the best answer. Only strategy and personal matters will be treated confidentially.
I will appreciate that if you do have a point you want to make, you provide a citation to support what you are saying, if a citation exists.
If you do not have a citation, still make your argument. I will consider all comments and choose which points to incorporate into our opposition brief.
The points to research and comment on are standing and immunity. For a full reading of how the defendants are using these defenses to try to convince the judicial branch of government not to address the issue of Obama’s Article II “natural born Citizen” eligibility, you may clique on the link in this blog and view the defendants’ brief
http://www.scribd.com/doc/16831085/
that they filed in support of their motion to dismiss.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
~~~~
Looks like it’s time to forward suggestions to Mario Apuzzo now!
Email: apuzzo@erols.com
TEL: 732-521-1900 ~ FAX: 732-521-3906,
______________________________________________
Sunday, July 5, 2009
The Chalice Show - Patriot’s Heart Broadcasting - BlogTalkRadio Network -10:30 p.m. EDT Sunday 5 Jul 2009 -
Kerchner et al v. Obama & Congress Update
The Chalice Show - Patriot’s Heart Broadcasting - BlogTalkRadio Network 9 to 11 p.m. EDT Sunday 5 Jul 2009 -
Kerchner et al v. Obama & Congress lawsuit update and discussion of the new publicity campaign to make more people aware that Obama is not an Article II natural born citizen to Constitutional Standards and to increase public awareness of the existence of this lawsuit.
The Main Stream Media (MSM) still refuses to discuss the eligibility issue and thus more paid media Advertorial type advertising will be done using the following theme:
Kerchner-et-al-v-Obama-Congress-et-al-Advertorial-in-20090706-Issue-Wash-Times
I was on the last 1/2 hour segment of the Chalice Show from 10:30 to 11:00 p.m. EDT. Below is the link to download and listen to the two hour show.
The discussion of this case and the new advertising initiative begins 90 minutes in, the last half hour. Listen to it all or download it and fast forward to the last half hour where I discuss the case and
the new publicity fund initiative:
http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/protectourliberty.htm
The Chalice Show
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/PatriotsHeartNetwork/2009/07/06/The-Chalice-Show
Charles