The plan,from the look of his actions, is to advance socialism,power to his party while attacking capitalism every way he can.
To do it he needs both houses, a willing press, but most important 50% plus numbers in the rat polling machine.
Once his numbers drop below 50% he endangers rat reelection since this is an empty core party. With no solid core, no internal guiding beliefs other than pure unadulterated power, he can't last once he gets unpopular.
Endangering the reelection chances of either House or Senate members is the only thing the lemmings in both bodies will not stand for.
They will allow anything else.
To get there we have to provide the transparency he promised yet "forgot".
We have to show the public how he goes before them once a week and tries to recreate the "hope and "change" the errors of the previous week.
Example, his obvious attacks on capitalism and the economy of the U.S. by placing health care,further busting the budget, and every other agenda before fixing the economy did not go unnoticed by many who voted for him. His numbers will suffer when that happens.
Answer: tell Wall Street he is thinking about cutting taxes on them,--problem solved. Will that ever happen--doubtful--does it accomplish this weeks numbers game? Can he turf his way back to popularity? For a while. His side are incredibly stupid. They will fall for anything for a while but sooner or sooner he will be toast.
Once his numbers fall below 50% he will be a lame duck Socialist. Either that or the eligibility question will be outed.
Good polling article
###
*snip*
“Recent Gallup data echo these concerns. That polling shows that there are deep-seated, underlying economic concerns. Eighty-three percent say they are worried that the steps Mr. Obama is taking to fix the economy may not work and the economy will get worse.
Eighty-two percent say they are worried about the amount of money being added to the deficit. Seventy-eight percent are worried about inflation growing, and 69% say they are worried about the increasing role of the government in the U.S. economy.”
More here:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123690358175013837.html?mod=googlenews_wsj