Palmer was discussed in depth on another website yesterday. Folks over there have his number.
That's good. If you would be so kind, please alert them to this summary of my arguments so they don't have to dig through the threads and miss something.
My main critique of Polarik was that he reused his analysis of the Kos, Smears and politicheck images. Those were low res and could have rather easily been forged from low res scans of real COLB's and had the text (name, date, parents, etc) changed. That analysis does not apply to the factcheck photos.
Those were created by the following steps:
1. A computer generated text and border (the real Hawaii software or forger with photoshop)
2. A color printout of the computer generated text and border was made onto the crosshatched paper.
3. The paper was then embossed and stamped with the notary stamp and date stamped (all on or from the back)
4. The paper was then folded
5. The paper was then photographed by factcheck
The other critique I had of Calpernia and null and void is their theory that Ann and Obama Sr went to Kenya on a honeymoon. I have seen no evidence of that apart from the allegation by Berg that he has a recording of Obama's GM saying she was present at the birth. The problem with that is it a recording of someone's voice saying something and won't (and didn't) hold up in court.
In contrast we have statements (but not sworn testimony) in front of cameras by the Governor of Hawaii that she saw Obama's original birth certificate.
For evidence of forgery, it is clear that the seals used on DeCosta and Obama are different. But those were made in 2002 and 2007, so we would have to show that Hawaii didn't change their seal in that time period. There is no other evidence of forgery (re factcheck photos) that I am aware of.