No.
The Birth Certificate number issue is set out here in detail in an earlier post.
Initially, the fake birth certificate had the number blanked out by digital process--one of the things that demonstrated that the posted document was photoshoped.
The certificate number in Hawaii starts with a number which identifies the county of birth; the next four numbers are the year; the rest of the numbers identify the sequence in which this baby was born during the year.
Reason the fake certificate didn't have a number is because the makers didn't know what number would fit the sequence and would also not be the number of some live person who might appear and say, "no that can't be his certificate number because it is mine".
Calculations were made from the total number of births for the year and from knowledge about other certificates issued at points in the year of what the range of sequence numbers would have been for August 4, 1961.
Then, Obama went to Hawaii and came back with a certificate number which fit the sequence. You might speculate this is a number for an individual who died at or shortly after birth. But it could be anything. So far, no one has appeared to contest the issue.
And further, some document may well have been filed on August 8, 1961 that in fact got Obama a real number. You don't know.
Is there not a single contemporaneous state birth registry with a listing of all births in Hawaii for 1961, from which the phony number he obtained this summer can be compared to see if any other baby was assigned the same number in 1961? Many jurisdictions maintain such birth registries.