Compared to most litigation, this case is moving at breakneck speed. I don't see how Berg gets over the issue of whether he is a proper party plaintiff--he doesn't have standing.
Fact that the judge has not yet kicked him out on these grounds indicates either that the judge intends to hear the case or that this case is being strung out to impede the filing of another case.
Berg, or other taxpayers and citizens of Pennsylvania might have standing to sue the chief state electoral officer to get Obama off the ballot. Should have been joined when the case was filed. Should have joined the designated Obama electors. Too late to do that? Maybe--maybe not.
Anyone who has given money to the RNC or any of the national Republican fund raising efforts ought to write, email, or call any contacts they have available and urge them to get counsel to intervene in Berg's case to support him.
The quality of his papers appears to have improved which implies that he has and is getting help from some competent source.
thanks, that's encouraging.
Phil J. Berg files amended complaint in Berg v. Obama
Obama Crimes Website ^ | 10/06/08 | Phil J. Berg
Posted on Tuesday, October 07, 2008 9:09:15 PM by Hang’emAll
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2099409/posts
Phil J. Berg filed an amended complaint today in Berg v. Obama. The amended complaint adds the Pennsylvania Department of State, the Secretary of the Commonwealth Pedro A. Cortes (in his official capacity), the U. S. Sentate Committee on Rules and Administration, and Senator Diane Feinstein (in her official capacity as chairman) for their failure to exercise due diligence with respect to Barack Obama’s contitutional qualifications to be elected and serve as President of The United States, and for his inclusion on the ballot in Pennsylvania as a candidate for President of the United States.
The amended complaint also bolsters the standing argument and adds additional relevent facts.