Since the Hollander decision was that Hollander had not standing to present a claim before the court on the issue, that the rest of the Judge’s discussion is moot, and can be given no weight as precedence — it’s actually less weighty than an FR posting, because as a posting we have to Dale Carnegie it up — win friends or influence people — whereas and whereat the Judge had a captive audience and could wind on like a Joe Biden.
that the rest of the Judge’s discussion is mootI didn't reference his opinion, I referenced a fact that he included to support an argument. The mootness of his opinion doesn't negate the fact that FDR Jr was born in Canada and there was much discussion of his eligibility to succeed his father. I wouldn't have included the reference though if I had actually looked at the Jr. It's not strong support for this discussion.
The part of the Hollander opinion that is important is where the judge found the plaintiff lacked standing. I don't see where Mr. Berg has any greater standing than Mr. Hollander.