If that part of the story is correct, a joint investigation by the U S Attorney's Office and the Federal Election Commission ought to bring the issue to a head.Whoops, I forgot this part. The Hollander decision provides all the reasons that the courts have no jurisdiction in the Berg case as well.
But in reality, I think we're making this too complicated. I've come to believe the "natural born" clause refers to C-Section babies. At the time of the framing of the Constitution a C-Section probably left the kid a little touched in the head. Natural birth was better.
Do we know if either of the candidates were born via C-Section?