Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: icwhatudo

For those who think that the BHO BC that was posted, was then “blanked” out and put on photobucket......

That would be VERY difficult to do. Why?

To have blanked out the text of the BHO and then replaced those areas with the hatched green pattern, and then have that hatched pattern align so well, would be almost impossible. If that had been done, it would have already been discovered considering the amount of scrutiny the document has gotten.

I have used PhotoShop for 10 years extensively. That hatched pattern would be almost impossible to blank out and copy the pattern from another area of the BC. If the background was fairly solid, it would be easy. But that hatched pattern would be very very difficult.

If the BC is real, and was scanned, it would not be perfectly flat, and the hatching would not be 100% symtrical across the entire document. That is why many government documents have patterns like that. It makes them hard to manipulate and duplicate.

If you created a blank one, then you could save as a template. Pull it up, edit, and put whatever text you wanted.

But to start with a scanned document with that kind of pattern. Then to blank/replace those text areas with a pefectly matched hatch pattern would be very near impossible.

Pull up a document like that in Photoshop and try it yourself.

IMO, the BHO BC could not have been “blanked” and then used to create all the other documents. It started with a blank or created document. The BHO forgery was created. Then all the others from the same blank template.


464 posted on 07/03/2008 9:15:29 PM PDT by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies ]


To: gswilder
To have blanked out the text of the BHO and then replaced those areas with the hatched green pattern, and then have that hatched pattern align so well, would be almost impossible. If that had been done, it would have already been discovered considering the amount of scrutiny the document has gotten. I have used PhotoShop for 10 years extensively. That hatched pattern would be almost impossible to blank out and copy the pattern from another area of the BC. If the background was fairly solid, it would be easy. But that hatched pattern would be very very difficult. If the BC is real, and was scanned, it would not be perfectly flat, and the hatching would not be 100% symtrical across the entire document. That is why many government documents have patterns like that. It makes them hard to manipulate and duplicate.

Guess what--one of the first attacks was based on the fact that in the altered areas, the hatch lines fail to line up. Someone else has already demonstrated that flaw.

498 posted on 07/03/2008 9:55:46 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]

To: gswilder
To have blanked out the text of the BHO and then replaced those areas with the hatched green pattern, and then have that hatched pattern align so well, would be almost impossible. If that had been done, it would have already been discovered

You are right, it is impossible, thats why the hatched pattern doesn't line up. Its most obvious where OpenDNA covered up "AFRICAN" under the words FATHERS RACE". If you look under the letters FA you will see two straight lines like this = but in openDNA's creation the lines do not match up. Will post it in a little bit.

514 posted on 07/03/2008 10:14:19 PM PDT by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]

To: gswilder

Did my best to get the image blown up to post (where the hash marks don’t match) but can’t figure out how to do it and keep good resolution. Simply copy dna’s image and reduce brightness to -70 (I use serif photoplus so not sure if the # is same for reg photoshop.) Look at the = (hash marks) under the FA in “FATHERS RACE” and the = (hash marks) under the MO in “MOTHERS RACE” and let me know if you see the same thing I see (hash marks not lining up)

Just my opinion but it looks like OpenDNA copied the KOS file (his version is of less resolution-see post #527) and in response to jokes about McCains birth certificate created a blank one for posters to mess with for mcCain (he never “suggests that others “print one up” for candidate Obama” as the article claims)

The original KOS version may very well be a forgery, thats not my argument, but this OpenDNA creation and this story seems like a dead end. (again-I hope I’m wrong and those of you talking about “time stamps” please feel free to go into more detail)


577 posted on 07/03/2008 11:34:21 PM PDT by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]

To: gswilder

bttt


611 posted on 07/04/2008 4:42:43 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]

To: gswilder
But to start with a scanned document with that kind of pattern. Then to blank/replace those text areas with a pefectly matched hatch pattern would be very near impossible.

Could it be done by cutting and pasting hatch patterns from a blank area of the document? I am not a photoshop user, but I tried that in paint and the cut/paste was not terrible, although probably detectable somehow.

626 posted on 07/04/2008 5:41:50 AM PDT by palmer (Tag lines are an extra $1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson