Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void

WOSG: “You CANNOT deduce from the graphic Obama’s website posted that the original COLB it was produced from is invalid.”
N&V: “So any gross errors, use of the wrong phrase, or badly stitched together borders made of the wrong size diamonds doesn’t count?”

I meant by my statement that there are no ‘gross errors’. Such claims are not correct. The ‘wrong phrase’ claim was busted/disputed by KJC1, who has a COLB with the same phrasing as Obama’s.

“You can’t prove a web image is from a genuine document.”

I have never disagreed with that. My disagreement is with those who claim to ‘know’ its a forgery or claim ‘proof’ of it. They’ve not proven anything thus far.


3,414 posted on 07/14/2008 8:11:04 AM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - NObama, stop the Hype and Chains candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3348 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG
They’ve not proven anything thus far.

Nope "They", that is to say us, sitting in our pajamas, haven't proved anything.

All we did was keep the spotlight focused on the problem, and got close enough to the truth that Obama was forced to admit he falsified documents in a fraudulent attempt to deceive the voters.

What else is he trying to hide? Is he admitting to a federal offense in hopes of deflecting attention from the BIG crime?

Dunno. But do color me just the tensiest bit skeptical that there isn't more "there" there.

3,432 posted on 07/14/2008 9:06:24 AM PDT by null and void (Give a hoot - don't vote for Toot! I know Desmond Tutu and Barry Toot Toot is no Tutu...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3414 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson