Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: KJC1
... the DeCosta BC does not look like mine (which looks just like Obama's). That is a fact...

the deCosta document shows it was ACCEPTED in May, 1930.

... I have since acknowledged that there must be more than one version of BC abstracts...

Due to regular Revisions of the format,perhaps?

The date on the rear of the obama document, is, IMO the date the document was issued.

It would be most helpful if you would supply us with the date your FILED certificate was issued. Can you do that?

2,983 posted on 07/11/2008 6:50:13 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2980 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks

I am not getting sucked back into the wacky vortex where I am asked for info, I give it, and then my credibility is attacked because my answer isn’t what some want to hear or believe.

I am finished responding to this thread, with the exception of the FOIA-ping txflake mentioned.

Have a good weekend everyone.


2,985 posted on 07/11/2008 7:04:35 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2983 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson