Replies

WOSG, thanks for the link to that comment:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2040486/posts?page=1440#1440

KJC1 wrote:

1. A regular Certification of Birth says “Date Accepted By State Registrar” vs. Obama’s “Date Filed By Registrar”;

This is simply not true. I was born in Hawaii have a Hawaii “Certification of Live Birth” right before my very eyes and my copy says clear as day “DATE FILED BY REGISTRAR”.

KJC1 continues on to say:

‘In fact, the BC put up by Dolores or Doris whoever that people are gobbling up looks funny to me, not Obama’s. That’s not to say Dolores (who is this person anyway, and why is she deemed credible?) has offered up a fake, but rather a version that looks significantly different than mine—and Obama’s...’

IMO trying to cast doubt on the validity of the deCosta document smells.

WOSG, using this statement from that comment doesn’t enlighten us in any way. What we need to see is a FILED dcument bearing seal.

IMO trying to cast doubt on the validity of the deCosta document smells.

I really don't care if you think that "smells." I have since acknowledged that there must be more than one version of BC abstracts, but I 100% solidly maintain that the DeCosta BC does not look like mine (which looks just like Obama's). That is a fact.

Thanks for the courtesy ping, but it became clear to me about a week ago that some here don't give a flying fig about hearing things that don't fit their conspiracy. Instead of banging my head against the wall trying to stop the madness, I have decided to take a more passive role and simply watch this debacle in amazement, sometimes with audible gasps/outbursts of laughter and how doggone WRONG some of you are and you don't even have a clue you are off base at all. Oh well, at least this disease is isolated to just a few off on the backroom. Thank God this isn't on FR's front page anymore. :^)

“WOSG, thanks for the link to that comment:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2040486/posts?page=1440#1440

You’re welcome.

“IMO trying to cast doubt on the validity of the deCosta document smells.”

Grrrrr. NOBODY is casting doubt on the validity of the deCosta document. It is valid. And KJC1’s form is valid. We have a document that is *exactly* like the Obama COLB. reported by a freeper, KJC1. The fact that other COLB forms might have a different format does not invalidate the Obama COLB. We have to conclude that, rather than insist that only “one way” is done, that both formats were validly used.

“WOSG, using this statement from that comment doesn’t enlighten us in any way.”
Yes, it does. It elightens us that those claiming the Obama COLB is “a forgery” on the basis of “accepted by” vs “filed by” are spouting nonsense.

Please pay attention to the thread of the argument.

“What we need to see is a FILED dcument bearing seal.”
The impression of the seal in the Obama graphic of the doc has been identified. Tehy’ve delivered what you asked for.

The myth remains busted.