Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void

Reason I think the “wedding picture” is probably taken proximate in time to the marriage is because she is so young. I see my son’s girl friends in this age group (20-22)regularly; you might convince me she was 20 here but she isn’t much more than that. Pregnant? Who knows—maybe just a Honolulu dress a couple years later. But it isn’t very long after; under the circumstances, I am on the bet Obama’s representation is probably correct.


2,955 posted on 07/11/2008 1:15:00 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2938 | View Replies ]


To: David

“Reason I think the “wedding picture” is probably taken proximate in time to the marriage is because she is so young.”

She was young in 1971, only 28 or so.
She looks similar in the 1971 pic with Barack to the pictures with Lolo and the picture at the time.

It’s barack Jr in the other picture with Barack Sr and those pictures were taken at the same time, 1971.


2,959 posted on 07/11/2008 1:53:01 PM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - NObama, stop the Hype and Chains candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2955 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson